- brandnew.uk.com
- Compare
- Deebot T50 Max Pro Omni Gen 2 vs Freo Z10 Ultra
Ecovacs Deebot T50 Max Pro Omni Gen 2 vs Narwal Freo Z10 Ultra
What Deebot T50 Max Pro Omni Gen 2 does better (7) and where Freo Z10 Ultra wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.2Cleaning power9.3
8.7Navigation6.6
8.6Mopping8.2
8.4Base station7.2
8.6Battery7.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
Deebot T50 Max Pro Omni Gen 2Freo Z10 Ultra
| Deebot T50 Max Pro Omni Gen 2 | Freo Z10 Ultra | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 98 mm | 110 mm | −12 mm |
| Width / diameter | 353 mm | 355 mm | −2 mm |
| Length | 353 mm | 355 mm | −2 mm |
| Weight | 3.7 kg | 4.5 kg | −0.8 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Deebot T50 Max Pro Omni Gen 2 better than Freo Z10 Ultra?
- NavigationLaser (LiDAR) vs Camera (vSLAM)
- Runtime180 min vs 150 min+20%
- Mop lift height18 mm vs 12 mm+50%
- Suction power18,500 Pa vs 18,000 Pa+3%
- Height98 mm vs 110 mm+12%
- Threshold climbing22 mm vs 20 mm+10%
- Dust bag (dock)4 l vs 2.5 l+60%
Why is Freo Z10 Ultra better than Deebot T50 Max Pro Omni Gen 2?
- Dustbin (robot)300 ml vs 800 ml2.7×
- Noise level65 dB vs 56 dB+16%
- Clean water tank (dock)4 l vs 4.5 l+12%
Specifications
Side by side
| Suction & cleaning | ||
| Suction power | 18,500 Pa | 18,000 Pa |
| Dustbin (robot) | 300 ml | 800 ml |
| Main brush | Single main brush | Single main brush |
| Anti-tangle brush | Yes | Yes |
| Side brushes | 1 | 2 |
| Extending side brush | Yes | — |
| Carpet detection | Yes | Yes |
| Dirt detection | Yes | Yes |
| Noise level | 65 dB | 56 dB |
| Navigation & obstacles | ||
| Navigation | Laser (LiDAR) | Camera (vSLAM) |
| Navigation sensors | LiDAR laser (LDS), Wall sensor, Cliff sensors | vSLAM camera, Cliff sensors |
| Obstacle avoidance | AI camera | AI camera |
| Threshold climbing | 22 mm | 20 mm |
| No-go zones / virtual walls | Yes | Yes |
| Room mapping & room selection | Yes | Yes |
| Mopping | ||
| Mop type | Rotating mop pads | Rotating mop pads |
| Mop lifting on carpets | Yes | Yes |
| Mop lift height | 18 mm | 12 mm |
| Extending mop (edges) | Yes | Yes |
| Water tank (robot) | 80 ml | — |
| Base station | ||
| Base station | All-in-one dock (empty + wash) | All-in-one dock (empty + wash) |
| Auto-empty dust station | Yes | Yes |
| Dust bag (dock) | 4 l | 2.5 l |
| Mop washing in the dock | Yes | Yes |
| Hot-water mop washing | Yes | Yes |
| Hot-air mop drying | Yes | Yes |
| Automatic water refill | Yes | Yes |
| Clean water tank (dock) | 4 l | 4.5 l |
| Dirty water tank (dock) | 3 l | 4 l |
| Battery & runtime | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,400 mAh | 6,400 mAh |
| Runtime | 180 min | 150 min |
| Charging time | 210 min | — |
| Cleaning area per charge | — | 300 m² |
| Size & weight | ||
| Width / diameter | 353 mm | 355 mm |
| Length | 353 mm | 355 mm |
| Height | 98 mm | 110 mm |
| Weight | 3.7 kg | 4.5 kg |
| Shape | Round | Round |
| Colours | Black, Gold | Grey |
| App & smart home | ||
| App control | Yes | Yes |
| Voice assistants | Amazon Alexa, Google Assistant, Built-in voice assistant | Amazon Alexa, Google Assistant, Apple Siri |
| Matter | Yes | — |
| Live camera view / video call | Yes | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Ecovacs Deebot T50 Max Pro Omni Gen 2vsRoborock Qrevo L
9.08.7
vs
Ecovacs Deebot T50 Max Pro Omni Gen 2vsCecotec Conga X100
9.09.5
vs
Ecovacs Deebot T50 Max Pro Omni Gen 2vsLiectroux G7
vs
Ecovacs Deebot T50 Max Pro Omni Gen 2vsVexilar T8
vs
Ecovacs Deebot T50 Max Pro Omni Gen 2vsCecotec Conga 15090 SpinArm Home
9.08.7
vs
Dreame L10s Ultra Gen 3vsNarwal Freo Z10 Ultra
8.18.3