- brandnew.uk.com
- Compare
- Q7 TF+ vs S8 MaxV Ultra
Roborock Q7 TF+ vs Roborock S8 MaxV Ultra
What Q7 TF+ does better (4) and where S8 MaxV Ultra wins (6) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.4Cleaning power5.5
4.3Navigation7.6
4.4Mopping7.7
3.2Base station5.4
5.2Battery7.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
Q7 TF+S8 MaxV Ultra
| Q7 TF+ | S8 MaxV Ultra | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 99 mm | 103 mm | −4 mm |
| Width / diameter | 325 mm | 353 mm | −28 mm |
| Length | 325 mm | 353 mm | −28 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Q7 TF+ better than S8 MaxV Ultra?
- Water tank (robot)280 ml vs 100 ml2.8×
- Height99 mm vs 103 mm+4%
- Dust bag (dock)2.7 l vs 2.5 l+8%
- Noise level65 dB vs 67 dB+3%
Why is S8 MaxV Ultra better than Q7 TF+?
- Obstacle avoidanceBasic sensors (infrared / bumper) vs AI camera
- Mop typeMop pad vs Vibrating / sonic mop
- Base stationAuto-empty dock vs All-in-one dock (empty + wash)
- Battery capacity3,200 mAh vs 5,200 mAh+62%
- Runtime150 min vs 180 min+20%
- Dustbin (robot)200 ml vs 270 ml+35%
Specifications
Side by side
| Suction & cleaning | ||
| Suction power | 10,000 Pa | 10,000 Pa |
| Dustbin (robot) | 200 ml | 270 ml |
| Main brush | Single main brush | Dual main brushes |
| Anti-tangle brush | Yes | — |
| Side brushes | 1 | 1 |
| Extending side brush | — | Yes |
| Carpet detection | — | Yes |
| Dirt detection | — | Yes |
| Noise level | 65 dB | 67 dB |
| Navigation & obstacles | ||
| Navigation | Laser (LiDAR) | Laser (LiDAR) |
| Navigation sensors | LiDAR laser (LDS), Cliff sensors | LiDAR laser (LDS), Wall sensor, Cliff sensors |
| Obstacle avoidance | Basic sensors (infrared / bumper) | AI camera |
| Threshold climbing | — | 20 mm |
| No-go zones / virtual walls | Yes | Yes |
| Room mapping & room selection | Yes | Yes |
| Mopping | ||
| Mop type | Mop pad | Vibrating / sonic mop |
| Mop lifting on carpets | — | Yes |
| Mop lift height | — | 20 mm |
| Extending mop (edges) | — | Yes |
| Water tank (robot) | 280 ml | 100 ml |
| Base station | ||
| Base station | Auto-empty dock | All-in-one dock (empty + wash) |
| Auto-empty dust station | Yes | Yes |
| Dust bag (dock) | 2.7 l | 2.5 l |
| Mop washing in the dock | — | Yes |
| Hot-water mop washing | — | Yes |
| Hot-air mop drying | — | Yes |
| Automatic water refill | — | Yes |
| Clean water tank (dock) | — | 4 l |
| Battery & runtime | ||
| Battery capacity | 3,200 mAh | 5,200 mAh |
| Runtime | 150 min | 180 min |
| Charging time | — | 240 min |
| Cleaning area per charge | 300 m² | 300 m² |
| Recharge & resume | — | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Width / diameter | 325 mm | 353 mm |
| Length | 325 mm | 353 mm |
| Height | 99 mm | 103 mm |
| Weight | 4.7 kg | — |
| Shape | Round | Round |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| App & smart home | ||
| App control | Yes | Yes |
| Voice assistants | — | Amazon Alexa, Google Assistant, Apple Siri |
| Live camera view / video call | — | Yes |
| Remote control | — | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Roborock Saros 20XvsRoborock Q7 TF+
9.55.7
vs
Dreame L40s Pro UltravsRoborock Q7 TF+
8.35.7
vs
Roborock Saros 20 SonicvsRoborock Q7 TF+
9.25.7
vs
Roborock Qrevo Edge 5V1vsRoborock Q7 TF+
8.45.7
vs
Dreame Matrix10 UltravsRoborock Q7 TF+
9.45.7
vs
Ecovacs Deebot T90 Pro OmnivsRoborock Q7 TF+
9.75.7