- brandnew.uk.com
- Compare
- HomeRun 9000 Aqua XU9100 vs Robot Vacuum X20 Max
Philips HomeRun 9000 Aqua XU9100 vs Xiaomi Robot Vacuum X20 Max
What HomeRun 9000 Aqua XU9100 does better (5) and where Robot Vacuum X20 Max wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.6Cleaning power5.5
5.8Navigation8.3
3.7Mopping6.7
8.4Base station7.2
9.4Battery4.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
HomeRun 9000 Aqua XU9100Robot Vacuum X20 Max
| HomeRun 9000 Aqua XU9100 | Robot Vacuum X20 Max | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 98 mm | 97 mm | +1 mm |
| Width / diameter | 365 mm | 350 mm | +15 mm |
| Length | 365 mm | 350 mm | +15 mm |
| Weight | 5 kg | 3.9 kg | +1.1 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is HomeRun 9000 Aqua XU9100 better than Robot Vacuum X20 Max?
- Runtime280 min vs 120 min2.3×
- Battery capacity6,500 mAh vs 5,200 mAh+25%
- Cleaning area per charge250 m² vs 200 m²+25%
- Dust bag (dock)3 l vs 2.5 l+20%
- Charging time330 min vs 360 min+9%
Why is Robot Vacuum X20 Max better than HomeRun 9000 Aqua XU9100?
- Obstacle avoidanceBasic sensors (infrared / bumper) vs AI camera
- Mop typeMop pad vs Rotating mop pads
- Dustbin (robot)210 ml vs 300 ml+43%
- Clean water tank (dock)3.5 l vs 4 l+14%
Specifications
Side by side
| Suction & cleaning | ||
| Suction power | 8,000 Pa | 8,000 Pa |
| Dustbin (robot) | 210 ml | 300 ml |
| Main brush | Single main brush | Single main brush |
| Anti-tangle brush | — | Yes |
| Side brushes | 1 | 1 |
| Carpet detection | Yes | Yes |
| HEPA filter | Yes | — |
| Noise level | 66 dB | — |
| Navigation & obstacles | ||
| Navigation | Laser (LiDAR) | Laser (LiDAR) |
| Navigation sensors | LiDAR laser (LDS), dToF laser, Wall sensor, Cliff sensors | LiDAR laser (LDS), Wall sensor, Cliff sensors, Ultrasonic sensor |
| Obstacle avoidance | Basic sensors (infrared / bumper) | AI camera |
| Threshold climbing | 20 mm | — |
| No-go zones / virtual walls | Yes | Yes |
| Room mapping & room selection | Yes | Yes |
| Mopping | ||
| Mop type | Mop pad | Rotating mop pads |
| Mop lifting on carpets | Yes | Yes |
| Mop lift height | — | 10 mm |
| Extending mop (edges) | — | Yes |
| Water tank (robot) | 90 ml | — |
| Base station | ||
| Base station | All-in-one dock (empty + wash) | All-in-one dock (empty + wash) |
| Auto-empty dust station | Yes | Yes |
| Dust bag (dock) | 3 l | 2.5 l |
| Mop washing in the dock | Yes | Yes |
| Hot-water mop washing | — | Yes |
| Hot-air mop drying | Yes | Yes |
| Automatic water refill | Yes | Yes |
| Clean water tank (dock) | 3.5 l | 4 l |
| Dirty water tank (dock) | 2.7 l | 3.8 l |
| Battery & runtime | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,500 mAh | 5,200 mAh |
| Runtime | 280 min | 120 min |
| Charging time | 330 min | 360 min |
| Cleaning area per charge | 250 m² | 200 m² |
| Size & weight | ||
| Width / diameter | 365 mm | 350 mm |
| Length | 365 mm | 350 mm |
| Height | 98 mm | 97 mm |
| Weight | 5 kg | 3.9 kg |
| Shape | Round | Round |
| Colours | Grey, Black | Black |
| App & smart home | ||
| App control | Yes | Yes |
| Voice assistants | Amazon Alexa, Google Assistant | Amazon Alexa, Google Assistant |
Related comparisons
vs
Philips HomeRun 3000 Aqua XU3100vsPhilips HomeRun 9000 Aqua XU9100
5.77.2
vs
Philips HomeRun 9000 Aqua XU9100vsNarwal Freo X Ultra Extend
vs
Philips HomeRun 9000 Aqua XU9100vsUltenic T10 Lite
7.27.2
vs
Philips HomeRun 9000 Aqua XU9100vsSilvercrest SSR 3000 A1
vs
Philips HomeRun 7000 Aqua XU7100vsPhilips HomeRun 9000 Aqua XU9100
5.87.2
vs
Philips HomeRun 3000 Aqua XU3110vsPhilips HomeRun 9000 Aqua XU9100
5.77.2