- brandnew.uk.com
- Compare
- HomeRun 3000 Aqua XU3100 vs Qrevo C Pro
Philips HomeRun 3000 Aqua XU3100 vs Roborock Qrevo C Pro
What HomeRun 3000 Aqua XU3100 does better (4) and where Qrevo C Pro wins (7) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.7Cleaning power8.2
2.8Navigation5.8
4.7Mopping6.4
3.5Base station6.3
5.5Battery7.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
HomeRun 3000 Aqua XU3100Qrevo C Pro
| HomeRun 3000 Aqua XU3100 | Qrevo C Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 96 mm | 96 mm | = |
| Width / diameter | 341 mm | 353 mm | −12 mm |
| Length | 341 mm | 353 mm | −12 mm |
| Weight | 3.8 kg | 3.6 kg | +0.2 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is HomeRun 3000 Aqua XU3100 better than Qrevo C Pro?
- Runtime200 min vs 180 min+11%
- Water tank (robot)300 ml vs 80 ml3.8×
- Dust bag (dock)3 l vs 2.7 l+11%
- Dustbin (robot)350 ml vs 325 ml+8%
Why is Qrevo C Pro better than HomeRun 3000 Aqua XU3100?
- Suction power4,000 Pa vs 18,500 Pa4.6×
- Mop typeMop pad vs Rotating mop pads
- Base stationAuto-empty dock vs All-in-one dock (empty + wash)
- Charging time390 min vs 150 min2.6×
- Threshold climbing17 mm vs 20 mm+18%
- Battery capacity4,800 mAh vs 5,200 mAh+8%
- Noise level66 dB vs 64 dB+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Suction & cleaning | ||
| Suction power | 4,000 Pa | 18,500 Pa |
| Dustbin (robot) | 350 ml | 325 ml |
| Main brush | Single main brush | Single main brush |
| Anti-tangle brush | — | Yes |
| Side brushes | 1 | 1 |
| Carpet detection | Yes | Yes |
| Noise level | 66 dB | 64 dB |
| Navigation & obstacles | ||
| Navigation | Laser (LiDAR) | Laser (LiDAR) |
| Navigation sensors | LiDAR laser (LDS), Cliff sensors | LiDAR laser (LDS), Wall sensor, Cliff sensors, Ultrasonic sensor |
| Obstacle avoidance | Basic sensors (infrared / bumper) | Basic sensors (infrared / bumper) |
| Threshold climbing | 17 mm | 20 mm |
| No-go zones / virtual walls | Yes | Yes |
| Room mapping & room selection | Yes | Yes |
| Mopping | ||
| Mop type | Mop pad | Rotating mop pads |
| Mop lifting on carpets | — | Yes |
| Mop lift height | — | 10 mm |
| Extending mop (edges) | — | Yes |
| Water tank (robot) | 300 ml | 80 ml |
| Base station | ||
| Base station | Auto-empty dock | All-in-one dock (empty + wash) |
| Auto-empty dust station | Yes | Yes |
| Dust bag (dock) | 3 l | 2.7 l |
| Mop washing in the dock | — | Yes |
| Hot-water mop washing | — | Yes |
| Hot-air mop drying | — | Yes |
| Automatic water refill | — | Yes |
| Battery & runtime | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,800 mAh | 5,200 mAh |
| Runtime | 200 min | 180 min |
| Charging time | 390 min | 150 min |
| Cleaning area per charge | 150 m² | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Width / diameter | 341 mm | 353 mm |
| Length | 341 mm | 353 mm |
| Height | 96 mm | 96 mm |
| Weight | 3.8 kg | 3.6 kg |
| Shape | Round | Round |
| Colours | Black, Grey | White |
| App & smart home | ||
| App control | Yes | Yes |
| Voice assistants | — | Amazon Alexa, Google Assistant |
Related comparisons
vs
Philips HomeRun 3000 Aqua XU3100vsPhilips HomeRun 7000 Aqua XU7100
5.35.3
vs
Philips HomeRun 3000 Aqua XU3100vsPhilips HomeRun 9000 Aqua XU9100
5.36.9
vs
Philips HomeRun 3000 Aqua XU3100vsVexilar T8
vs
Philips HomeRun 3000 Aqua XU3100vsMedion S35
vs
Philips HomeRun 3000 Aqua XU3100vsSilvercrest SSR 3000 A1
vs
Philips HomeRun 3000 Aqua XU3100vsSamsung Bespoke Jet Bot Combo AI+