- brandnew.uk.com
- Compare
- HomeRun 3000 Aqua XU3100 vs T8
Philips HomeRun 3000 Aqua XU3100 vs Vexilar T8
What HomeRun 3000 Aqua XU3100 does better (2) and where T8 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.5Battery5.2
Why is HomeRun 3000 Aqua XU3100 better than T8?
- Runtime200 min vs 150 min+33%
- Dustbin (robot)350 ml vs 300 ml+17%
Why is T8 better than HomeRun 3000 Aqua XU3100?
T8 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Suction & cleaning | ||
| Suction power | 4,000 Pa | — |
| Dustbin (robot) | 350 ml | 300 ml |
| Main brush | Single main brush | — |
| Side brushes | 1 | — |
| Carpet detection | Yes | — |
| Noise level | 66 dB | — |
| Navigation & obstacles | ||
| Navigation | Laser (LiDAR) | — |
| Navigation sensors | LiDAR laser (LDS), Cliff sensors | Cliff sensors |
| Obstacle avoidance | Basic sensors (infrared / bumper) | Basic sensors (infrared / bumper) |
| Threshold climbing | 17 mm | — |
| No-go zones / virtual walls | Yes | — |
| Room mapping & room selection | Yes | — |
| Mopping | ||
| Mop type | Mop pad | — |
| Water tank (robot) | 300 ml | — |
| Base station | ||
| Base station | Auto-empty dock | — |
| Auto-empty dust station | Yes | — |
| Dust bag (dock) | 3 l | — |
| Battery & runtime | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,800 mAh | — |
| Runtime | 200 min | 150 min |
| Charging time | 390 min | — |
| Cleaning area per charge | 150 m² | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Width / diameter | 341 mm | — |
| Length | 341 mm | — |
| Height | 96 mm | — |
| Weight | 3.8 kg | — |
| Shape | Round | — |
| Colours | Black, Grey | Black |
| App & smart home | ||
| App control | Yes | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Philips HomeRun 3000 Aqua XU3100vseufy Omni E28 HydroJet
vs
Philips HomeRun 3000 Aqua XU3100vsSamsung Bespoke Jet Bot Combo+
vs
Philips HomeRun 3000 Aqua XU3100vsPhilips HomeRun 9000 Aqua XU9100
5.77.2
vs
Philips HomeRun 3000 Aqua XU3100vsPhilips HomeRun 7000 Aqua XU7000
5.75.0
vs
Philips HomeRun 3000 Aqua XU3100vsShark PowerDetect Self-Empty
5.75.1
vs
Mova V50 UltravsVexilar T8