- brandnew.uk.com
- Compare
- HomeRun 3000 Aqua XU3100 vs T8
Philips HomeRun 3000 Aqua XU3100 vs Vexilar T8
What HomeRun 3000 Aqua XU3100 does better (2) and where T8 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.5Battery5.1
Why is HomeRun 3000 Aqua XU3100 better than T8?
- Runtime200 min vs 150 min+33%
- Dustbin (robot)350 ml vs 300 ml+17%
Why is T8 better than HomeRun 3000 Aqua XU3100?
T8 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Suction & cleaning | ||
| Suction power | 4,000 Pa | — |
| Dustbin (robot) | 350 ml | 300 ml |
| Main brush | Single main brush | — |
| Side brushes | 1 | — |
| Carpet detection | Yes | — |
| Noise level | 66 dB | — |
| Navigation & obstacles | ||
| Navigation | Laser (LiDAR) | — |
| Navigation sensors | LiDAR laser (LDS), Cliff sensors | Cliff sensors |
| Obstacle avoidance | Basic sensors (infrared / bumper) | Basic sensors (infrared / bumper) |
| Threshold climbing | 17 mm | — |
| No-go zones / virtual walls | Yes | — |
| Room mapping & room selection | Yes | — |
| Mopping | ||
| Mop type | Mop pad | — |
| Water tank (robot) | 300 ml | — |
| Base station | ||
| Base station | Auto-empty dock | — |
| Auto-empty dust station | Yes | — |
| Dust bag (dock) | 3 l | — |
| Battery & runtime | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,800 mAh | — |
| Runtime | 200 min | 150 min |
| Charging time | 390 min | — |
| Cleaning area per charge | 150 m² | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Width / diameter | 341 mm | — |
| Length | 341 mm | — |
| Height | 96 mm | — |
| Weight | 3.8 kg | — |
| Shape | Round | — |
| Colours | Black, Grey | Black |
| App & smart home | ||
| App control | Yes | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Philips HomeRun 3000 Aqua XU3100vsPhilips HomeRun 7000 Aqua XU7100
5.35.3
vs
Philips HomeRun 3000 Aqua XU3100vsPhilips HomeRun 9000 Aqua XU9100
5.36.9
vs
Philips HomeRun 3000 Aqua XU3100vsMedion S35
vs
Philips HomeRun 3000 Aqua XU3100vsSilvercrest SSR 3000 A1
vs
Philips HomeRun 3000 Aqua XU3100vsSamsung Bespoke Jet Bot Combo AI+
vs
Dreame Aqua10 Ultra RollervsVexilar T8