- brandnew.uk.com
- Compare
- HomeRun 2000 Gen 2 XU2100 vs Robot Vacuum S40 Pro
Philips HomeRun 2000 Gen 2 XU2100 vs Xiaomi Robot Vacuum S40 Pro
What HomeRun 2000 Gen 2 XU2100 does better (3) and where Robot Vacuum S40 Pro wins (9) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.7Cleaning power7.6
2.8Navigation5.0
4.8Mopping7.1
6.2Base station3.5
2.8Battery6.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
HomeRun 2000 Gen 2 XU2100Robot Vacuum S40 Pro
| HomeRun 2000 Gen 2 XU2100 | Robot Vacuum S40 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 97 mm | 99 mm | −2 mm |
| Width / diameter | 345 mm | 355 mm | −10 mm |
| Length | 345 mm | 355 mm | −10 mm |
| Weight | 3.1 kg | 4.2 kg | −1.1 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is HomeRun 2000 Gen 2 XU2100 better than Robot Vacuum S40 Pro?
- Base stationAuto-empty dock vs Charging dock
- Height97 mm vs 99 mm+2%
- Charging time330 min vs 360 min+9%
Why is Robot Vacuum S40 Pro better than HomeRun 2000 Gen 2 XU2100?
- Suction power6,000 Pa vs 15,000 Pa2.5×
- Mop typeMop pad vs Rotating mop pads
- Runtime120 min vs 180 min+50%
- Battery capacity2,600 mAh vs 5,200 mAh2×
- Threshold climbing17 mm vs 20 mm+18%
- Cleaning area per charge120 m² vs 180 m²+50%
- Dustbin (robot)380 ml vs 430 ml+13%
- Noise level68 dB vs 65 dB+5%
- Water tank (robot)300 ml vs 310 ml+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Suction & cleaning | ||
| Suction power | 6,000 Pa | 15,000 Pa |
| Dustbin (robot) | 380 ml | 430 ml |
| Main brush | Single main brush | Single main brush |
| Anti-tangle brush | — | Yes |
| Side brushes | 1 | 1 |
| Extending side brush | — | Yes |
| Carpet detection | — | Yes |
| HEPA filter | — | Yes |
| Noise level | 68 dB | 65 dB |
| Navigation & obstacles | ||
| Navigation | Laser (LiDAR) | Laser (LiDAR) |
| Navigation sensors | LiDAR laser (LDS), Cliff sensors | LiDAR laser (LDS), Wall sensor, Cliff sensors |
| Obstacle avoidance | Basic sensors (infrared / bumper) | Basic sensors (infrared / bumper) |
| Threshold climbing | 17 mm | 20 mm |
| No-go zones / virtual walls | Yes | — |
| Room mapping & room selection | Yes | Yes |
| Mopping | ||
| Mop type | Mop pad | Rotating mop pads |
| Mop lifting on carpets | — | Yes |
| Mop lift height | — | 10 mm |
| Extending mop (edges) | — | Yes |
| Water tank (robot) | 300 ml | 310 ml |
| Base station | ||
| Base station | Auto-empty dock | Charging dock |
| Auto-empty dust station | Yes | — |
| Dust bag (dock) | 3 l | — |
| Battery & runtime | ||
| Battery capacity | 2,600 mAh | 5,200 mAh |
| Runtime | 120 min | 180 min |
| Charging time | 330 min | 360 min |
| Cleaning area per charge | 120 m² | 180 m² |
| Size & weight | ||
| Width / diameter | 345 mm | 355 mm |
| Length | 345 mm | 355 mm |
| Height | 97 mm | 99 mm |
| Weight | 3.1 kg | 4.2 kg |
| Shape | Round | Round |
| Colours | White | White |
| App & smart home | ||
| App control | Yes | Yes |
| Voice assistants | Amazon Alexa, Google Assistant | Amazon Alexa, Google Assistant |
Related comparisons
vs
Philips HomeRun 2000 Gen 2 XU2100vsShark PowerDetect Self-Empty
5.15.1
vs
Philips HomeRun 2000 Gen 2 XU2100vsTesvor S8 Pro
vs
Philips HomeRun 2000 Gen 2 XU2100vsClean Air Optima RVC-001 Smart
vs
Philips HomeRun 2000 Gen 2 XU2100vsVexilar T8
vs
Roborock Q10 VF+vsXiaomi Robot Vacuum S40 Pro
6.86.7
vs
Dreame L10s Pro Gen 3vsXiaomi Robot Vacuum S40 Pro
6.76.7