- brandnew.uk.com
- Compare
- HomeRun 2000 Gen 2 XU2100 vs S8 Pro
Philips HomeRun 2000 Gen 2 XU2100 vs Tesvor S8 Pro
What HomeRun 2000 Gen 2 XU2100 does better (1) and where S8 Pro wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.8Battery7.2
Why is HomeRun 2000 Gen 2 XU2100 better than S8 Pro?
- Dustbin (robot)380 ml vs 300 ml+27%
Why is S8 Pro better than HomeRun 2000 Gen 2 XU2100?
- Runtime120 min vs 180 min+50%
Specifications
Side by side
| Suction & cleaning | ||
| Suction power | 6,000 Pa | — |
| Dustbin (robot) | 380 ml | 300 ml |
| Main brush | Single main brush | — |
| Side brushes | 1 | — |
| Noise level | 68 dB | — |
| Navigation & obstacles | ||
| Navigation | Laser (LiDAR) | — |
| Navigation sensors | LiDAR laser (LDS), Cliff sensors | Cliff sensors |
| Obstacle avoidance | Basic sensors (infrared / bumper) | Basic sensors (infrared / bumper) |
| Threshold climbing | 17 mm | — |
| No-go zones / virtual walls | Yes | — |
| Room mapping & room selection | Yes | — |
| Mopping | ||
| Mop type | Mop pad | — |
| Water tank (robot) | 300 ml | — |
| Base station | ||
| Base station | Auto-empty dock | — |
| Auto-empty dust station | Yes | — |
| Dust bag (dock) | 3 l | — |
| Battery & runtime | ||
| Battery capacity | 2,600 mAh | — |
| Runtime | 120 min | 180 min |
| Charging time | 330 min | — |
| Cleaning area per charge | 120 m² | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Width / diameter | 345 mm | — |
| Length | 345 mm | — |
| Height | 97 mm | — |
| Weight | 3.1 kg | — |
| Shape | Round | Round |
| Colours | White | White |
| App & smart home | ||
| App control | Yes | — |
| Voice assistants | Amazon Alexa, Google Assistant | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Philips HomeRun 2000 Gen 2 XU2100vsClean Air Optima RVC-001 Smart
vs
Philips HomeRun 2000 Gen 2 XU2100vsVexilar T8
vs
Philips HomeRun 2000 Gen 2 XU2100vsShark PowerDetect Self-Empty
5.15.1
vs
Roborock Q10 VF+vsTesvor S8 Pro
vs
Ecovacs Deebot T50 Omni Gen 2vsTesvor S8 Pro
vs
Ecovacs Deebot T30C Omni Gen 2vsTesvor S8 Pro