- brandnew.uk.com
- Compare
- HomeRun 2000 Gen 2 XU2100 vs T20 Pro
Philips HomeRun 2000 Gen 2 XU2100 vs Ultenic T20 Pro
What HomeRun 2000 Gen 2 XU2100 does better (0) and where T20 Pro wins (5) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.7Cleaning power6.5
2.8Navigation4.3
4.8Mopping2.4
6.2Base station6.4
2.8Battery4.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
HomeRun 2000 Gen 2 XU2100T20 Pro
| HomeRun 2000 Gen 2 XU2100 | T20 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 97 mm | 97 mm | = |
| Width / diameter | 345 mm | 320 mm | +25 mm |
| Length | 345 mm | 320 mm | +25 mm |
| Weight | 3.1 kg | 5.7 kg | −2.6 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is HomeRun 2000 Gen 2 XU2100 better than T20 Pro?
HomeRun 2000 Gen 2 XU2100 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is T20 Pro better than HomeRun 2000 Gen 2 XU2100?
- Suction power6,000 Pa vs 8,000 Pa+33%
- Cleaning area per charge120 m² vs 200 m²+67%
- Dust bag (dock)3 l vs 3.5 l+17%
- Noise level68 dB vs 60 dB+13%
- Charging time330 min vs 300 min+10%
Specifications
Side by side
| Suction & cleaning | ||
| Suction power | 6,000 Pa | 8,000 Pa |
| Dustbin (robot) | 380 ml | — |
| Main brush | Single main brush | Single main brush |
| Side brushes | 1 | 1 |
| Carpet detection | — | Yes |
| HEPA filter | — | Yes |
| Noise level | 68 dB | 60 dB |
| Navigation & obstacles | ||
| Navigation | Laser (LiDAR) | Laser (LiDAR) |
| Navigation sensors | LiDAR laser (LDS), Cliff sensors | LiDAR laser (LDS) |
| Obstacle avoidance | Basic sensors (infrared / bumper) | Basic sensors (infrared / bumper) |
| Threshold climbing | 17 mm | — |
| No-go zones / virtual walls | Yes | Yes |
| Room mapping & room selection | Yes | Yes |
| Mopping | ||
| Mop type | Mop pad | Mop pad |
| Water tank (robot) | 300 ml | — |
| Base station | ||
| Base station | Auto-empty dock | Auto-empty dock |
| Auto-empty dust station | Yes | Yes |
| Dust bag (dock) | 3 l | 3.5 l |
| Battery & runtime | ||
| Battery capacity | 2,600 mAh | — |
| Runtime | 120 min | 120 min |
| Charging time | 330 min | 300 min |
| Cleaning area per charge | 120 m² | 200 m² |
| Size & weight | ||
| Width / diameter | 345 mm | 320 mm |
| Length | 345 mm | 320 mm |
| Height | 97 mm | 97 mm |
| Weight | 3.1 kg | 5.7 kg |
| Shape | Round | Round |
| Colours | White | Black |
| App & smart home | ||
| App control | Yes | Yes |
| Voice assistants | Amazon Alexa, Google Assistant | Amazon Alexa, Google Assistant, Apple Siri |
Related comparisons
vs
Philips HomeRun 2000 Gen 2 XU2100vsShark PowerDetect Self-Empty
5.15.1
vs
Philips HomeRun 2000 Gen 2 XU2100vsTesvor S8 Pro
vs
Philips HomeRun 2000 Gen 2 XU2100vsClean Air Optima RVC-001 Smart
vs
Philips HomeRun 2000 Gen 2 XU2100vsVexilar T8
vs
Ultenic T20 ProvsTesvor S8 Pro
vs
Ultenic T20 ProvsUwant U100 Lite