- brandnew.uk.com
- Compare
- HomeRun 2000 Gen 2 XU2100 vs Q10 VF+
Philips HomeRun 2000 Gen 2 XU2100 vs Roborock Q10 VF+
What HomeRun 2000 Gen 2 XU2100 does better (4) and where Q10 VF+ wins (6) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.7Cleaning power6.6
2.8Navigation4.3
4.7Mopping5.6
3.5Base station3.2
2.7Battery5.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
HomeRun 2000 Gen 2 XU2100Q10 VF+
| HomeRun 2000 Gen 2 XU2100 | Q10 VF+ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 97 mm | 99 mm | −2 mm |
| Width / diameter | 345 mm | 353 mm | −8 mm |
| Length | 345 mm | 353 mm | −8 mm |
| Weight | 3.1 kg | 4.8 kg | −1.7 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is HomeRun 2000 Gen 2 XU2100 better than Q10 VF+?
- Height97 mm vs 99 mm+2%
- Water tank (robot)300 ml vs 240 ml+25%
- Dust bag (dock)3 l vs 2.7 l+11%
- Dustbin (robot)380 ml vs 350 ml+9%
Why is Q10 VF+ better than HomeRun 2000 Gen 2 XU2100?
- Mop typeMop pad vs Vibrating / sonic mop
- Suction power6,000 Pa vs 10,000 Pa+67%
- Battery capacity2,600 mAh vs 5,200 mAh2×
- Runtime120 min vs 150 min+25%
- Charging time330 min vs 240 min+38%
- Noise level68 dB vs 65 dB+5%
Specifications
Side by side
| Suction & cleaning | ||
| Suction power | 6,000 Pa | 10,000 Pa |
| Dustbin (robot) | 380 ml | 350 ml |
| Main brush | Single main brush | Single main brush |
| Anti-tangle brush | — | Yes |
| Side brushes | 1 | 1 |
| Carpet detection | — | Yes |
| Noise level | 68 dB | 65 dB |
| Navigation & obstacles | ||
| Navigation | Laser (LiDAR) | Laser (LiDAR) |
| Navigation sensors | LiDAR laser (LDS), Cliff sensors | LiDAR laser (LDS), Cliff sensors |
| Obstacle avoidance | Basic sensors (infrared / bumper) | Basic sensors (infrared / bumper) |
| Threshold climbing | 17 mm | — |
| No-go zones / virtual walls | Yes | Yes |
| Room mapping & room selection | Yes | Yes |
| Mopping | ||
| Mop type | Mop pad | Vibrating / sonic mop |
| Mop lifting on carpets | — | Yes |
| Mop lift height | — | 8 mm |
| Water tank (robot) | 300 ml | 240 ml |
| Base station | ||
| Base station | Auto-empty dock | Auto-empty dock |
| Auto-empty dust station | Yes | Yes |
| Dust bag (dock) | 3 l | 2.7 l |
| Battery & runtime | ||
| Battery capacity | 2,600 mAh | 5,200 mAh |
| Runtime | 120 min | 150 min |
| Charging time | 330 min | 240 min |
| Cleaning area per charge | 120 m² | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Width / diameter | 345 mm | 353 mm |
| Length | 345 mm | 353 mm |
| Height | 97 mm | 99 mm |
| Weight | 3.1 kg | 4.8 kg |
| Shape | Round | Round |
| Colours | White | Black |
| App & smart home | ||
| App control | Yes | Yes |
| Voice assistants | Amazon Alexa, Google Assistant | Amazon Alexa, Google Assistant |
Related comparisons
vs
Lubluelu SL68vsPhilips HomeRun 2000 Gen 2 XU2100
5.04.9
vs
Lubluelu SL68WvsPhilips HomeRun 2000 Gen 2 XU2100
5.04.9
vs
Philips HomeRun 2000 Gen 2 XU2100vsClean Air Optima RVC-001 Smart
vs
Philips HomeRun 2000 Gen 2 XU2100vsVexilar T8
vs
Ecovacs Deebot X11 OmniCyclonevsRoborock Q10 VF+
9.06.4
vs
Roborock Q10 VF+vsDyson Spot+Scrub AI
6.48.9