- brandnew.uk.com
- Compare
- Flow 2 vs HomeRun 9000 Aqua XU9100
Narwal Flow 2 vs Philips HomeRun 9000 Aqua XU9100
What Flow 2 does better (8) and where HomeRun 9000 Aqua XU9100 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.7Cleaning power4.7
9.1Navigation5.8
9.1Mopping3.7
7.6Base station7.4
9.8Battery9.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
Flow 2HomeRun 9000 Aqua XU9100
| Flow 2 | HomeRun 9000 Aqua XU9100 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 95 mm | 98 mm | −3 mm |
| Width / diameter | 364 mm | 365 mm | −1 mm |
| Length | 364 mm | 365 mm | −1 mm |
| Weight | 5 kg | 5 kg | = |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Flow 2 better than HomeRun 9000 Aqua XU9100?
- Suction power31,000 Pa vs 8,000 Pa3.9×
- Obstacle avoidanceAI camera vs Basic sensors (infrared / bumper)
- Mop typeRoller mop vs Mop pad
- Threshold climbing40 mm vs 20 mm2×
- Charging time180 min vs 330 min+83%
- Height95 mm vs 98 mm+3%
- Noise level56 dB vs 66 dB+17%
- Cleaning area per charge289 m² vs 250 m²+16%
Why is HomeRun 9000 Aqua XU9100 better than Flow 2?
HomeRun 9000 Aqua XU9100 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Suction & cleaning | ||
| Suction power | 31,000 Pa | 8,000 Pa |
| Dustbin (robot) | — | 210 ml |
| Main brush | Single main brush | Single main brush |
| Anti-tangle brush | Yes | — |
| Side brushes | 1 | 1 |
| Carpet detection | Yes | Yes |
| Dirt detection | Yes | — |
| HEPA filter | — | Yes |
| Noise level | 56 dB | 66 dB |
| Navigation & obstacles | ||
| Navigation | Laser (LiDAR) | Laser (LiDAR) |
| Navigation sensors | LiDAR laser (LDS), Cliff sensors | LiDAR laser (LDS), dToF laser, Wall sensor, Cliff sensors |
| Obstacle avoidance | AI camera | Basic sensors (infrared / bumper) |
| Threshold climbing | 40 mm | 20 mm |
| No-go zones / virtual walls | Yes | Yes |
| Room mapping & room selection | Yes | Yes |
| Mopping | ||
| Mop type | Roller mop | Mop pad |
| Mop lifting on carpets | Yes | Yes |
| Mop lift height | 12 mm | — |
| Extending mop (edges) | Yes | — |
| Water tank (robot) | — | 90 ml |
| Base station | ||
| Base station | All-in-one dock (empty + wash) | All-in-one dock (empty + wash) |
| Auto-empty dust station | Yes | Yes |
| Dust bag (dock) | — | 3 l |
| Mop washing in the dock | Yes | Yes |
| Hot-water mop washing | Yes | — |
| Hot-air mop drying | Yes | Yes |
| Automatic water refill | Yes | Yes |
| Clean water tank (dock) | — | 3.5 l |
| Dirty water tank (dock) | — | 2.7 l |
| Battery & runtime | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,500 mAh | 6,500 mAh |
| Runtime | — | 280 min |
| Charging time | 180 min | 330 min |
| Cleaning area per charge | 289 m² | 250 m² |
| Size & weight | ||
| Width / diameter | 364 mm | 365 mm |
| Length | 364 mm | 365 mm |
| Height | 95 mm | 98 mm |
| Weight | 5 kg | 5 kg |
| Shape | Round | Round |
| Colours | Grey | Grey, Black |
| App & smart home | ||
| App control | Yes | Yes |
| Voice assistants | Amazon Alexa, Google Assistant, Apple Siri | Amazon Alexa, Google Assistant |
| Live camera view / video call | Yes | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Roborock Saros 20 FlowvsNarwal Flow 2
9.69.7
vs
Narwal Flow 2vsDreame L60 Pro Ultra
9.79.5
vs
Narwal Flow 2vsDaewoo Cyclone Freedom
vs
Narwal Flow 2vsHoover HG2 Turbo Slim Hydro Pro
vs
Philips HomeRun 3000 Aqua XU3100vsPhilips HomeRun 9000 Aqua XU9100
5.36.9
vs
Philips HomeRun 9000 Aqua XU9100vsNarwal Freo X Ultra Extend