Head-to-head of the week · Mova Z60 Ultra Roller vs Dreame Aqua10 Ultra RollerSee the comparisonAdvertise
  1. brandnew.uk.com
  2. Compare
  3. I-Dancer Turbo Laser vs HomeRun 2000 Gen 2 XU2100

Grunkel I-Dancer Turbo Laser vs Philips HomeRun 2000 Gen 2 XU2100

What I-Dancer Turbo Laser does better (0) and where HomeRun 2000 Gen 2 XU2100 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Grunkel I-Dancer Turbo Laser
Grunkel · 2024I-Dancer Turbo Laser
4.9Score
0 advantages≈ US$240
Higher score
vs
Philips HomeRun 2000 Gen 2 XU2100
4.9Score
2 advantages≈ US$230
3.8Cleaning power4.7
7.1Navigation2.8
3.1Battery2.7

Why is I-Dancer Turbo Laser better than HomeRun 2000 Gen 2 XU2100?

I-Dancer Turbo Laser has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Why is HomeRun 2000 Gen 2 XU2100 better than I-Dancer Turbo Laser?

  1. Suction power5,000 Pa vs 6,000 Pa+20%
  2. Dustbin (robot)300 ml vs 380 ml+27%
Specifications

Side by side

Suction & cleaning
Suction power5,000 Pa6,000 Pa
Dustbin (robot)300 ml380 ml
Main brush—Single main brush
Side brushes—1
Noise level—68 dB
Navigation & obstacles
NavigationLaser (LiDAR)Laser (LiDAR)
Navigation sensorsLiDAR laser (LDS)LiDAR laser (LDS), Cliff sensors
Obstacle avoidance—Basic sensors (infrared / bumper)
Threshold climbing—17 mm
No-go zones / virtual walls—Yes
Room mapping & room selectionYesYes
Mopping
Mop type—Mop pad
Water tank (robot)—300 ml
Base station
Base station—Auto-empty dock
Auto-empty dust station—Yes
Dust bag (dock)—3 l
Battery & runtime
Battery capacity—2,600 mAh
Runtime120 min120 min
Charging time—330 min
Cleaning area per charge—120 m²
Size & weight
Width / diameter—345 mm
Length—345 mm
Height—97 mm
Weight—3.1 kg
ShapeRoundRound
Colours—White
App & smart home
App controlYesYes
Voice assistantsGoogle AssistantAmazon Alexa, Google Assistant
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare