- brandnew.uk.com
- Compare
- RS20 Pro vs HomeRun 9000 Aqua XU9100
EZVIZ RS20 Pro vs Philips HomeRun 9000 Aqua XU9100
What RS20 Pro does better (8) and where HomeRun 9000 Aqua XU9100 wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.8Cleaning power4.7
7.6Navigation5.8
7.9Mopping3.7
9.2Base station7.4
8.4Battery9.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
RS20 ProHomeRun 9000 Aqua XU9100
| RS20 Pro | HomeRun 9000 Aqua XU9100 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 101 mm | 98 mm | +3 mm |
| Width / diameter | 365 mm | 365 mm | = |
| Length | 365 mm | 365 mm | = |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is RS20 Pro better than HomeRun 9000 Aqua XU9100?
- Obstacle avoidanceAI camera vs Basic sensors (infrared / bumper)
- Mop typeRotating mop pads vs Mop pad
- Charging time180 min vs 330 min+83%
- Dustbin (robot)350 ml vs 210 ml+67%
- Dust bag (dock)5 l vs 3 l+67%
- Clean water tank (dock)5 l vs 3.5 l+43%
- Cleaning area per charge300 m² vs 250 m²+20%
- Water tank (robot)100 ml vs 90 ml+11%
Why is HomeRun 9000 Aqua XU9100 better than RS20 Pro?
- Runtime190 min vs 280 min+47%
- Suction power7,200 Pa vs 8,000 Pa+11%
- Battery capacity5,200 mAh vs 6,500 mAh+25%
- Height101 mm vs 98 mm+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Suction & cleaning | ||
| Suction power | 7,200 Pa | 8,000 Pa |
| Dustbin (robot) | 350 ml | 210 ml |
| Main brush | Single main brush | Single main brush |
| Anti-tangle brush | Yes | — |
| Side brushes | 2 | 1 |
| Carpet detection | Yes | Yes |
| Dirt detection | Yes | — |
| HEPA filter | — | Yes |
| Noise level | 65 dB | 66 dB |
| Navigation & obstacles | ||
| Navigation | Laser (LiDAR) | Laser (LiDAR) |
| Navigation sensors | LiDAR laser (LDS), Wall sensor, Cliff sensors | LiDAR laser (LDS), dToF laser, Wall sensor, Cliff sensors |
| Obstacle avoidance | AI camera | Basic sensors (infrared / bumper) |
| Threshold climbing | 20 mm | 20 mm |
| No-go zones / virtual walls | Yes | Yes |
| Room mapping & room selection | Yes | Yes |
| Mopping | ||
| Mop type | Rotating mop pads | Mop pad |
| Mop lifting on carpets | — | Yes |
| Automatic mop removal | Yes | — |
| Water tank (robot) | 100 ml | 90 ml |
| Base station | ||
| Base station | All-in-one dock (empty + wash) | All-in-one dock (empty + wash) |
| Auto-empty dust station | Yes | Yes |
| Dust bag (dock) | 5 l | 3 l |
| Mop washing in the dock | Yes | Yes |
| Hot-water mop washing | Yes | — |
| Hot-air mop drying | Yes | Yes |
| Automatic water refill | Yes | Yes |
| Clean water tank (dock) | 5 l | 3.5 l |
| Dirty water tank (dock) | 4.2 l | 2.7 l |
| Battery & runtime | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,200 mAh | 6,500 mAh |
| Runtime | 190 min | 280 min |
| Charging time | 180 min | 330 min |
| Cleaning area per charge | 300 m² | 250 m² |
| Size & weight | ||
| Width / diameter | 365 mm | 365 mm |
| Length | 365 mm | 365 mm |
| Height | 101 mm | 98 mm |
| Weight | — | 5 kg |
| Shape | Round | Round |
| Colours | White | Grey, Black |
| App & smart home | ||
| App control | Yes | Yes |
| Voice assistants | Amazon Alexa, Google Assistant | Amazon Alexa, Google Assistant |
| Live camera view / video call | Yes | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Dreame L40s Pro UltravsEZVIZ RS20 Pro
8.38.4
vs
DJI Romo SvsEZVIZ RS20 Pro
8.48.4
vs
Ecovacs Deebot T50 Pro OmnivsEZVIZ RS20 Pro
8.38.4
vs
EZVIZ RS20 ProvsVexilar T8
vs
Philips HomeRun 3000 Aqua XU3100vsPhilips HomeRun 9000 Aqua XU9100
5.36.9
vs
Philips HomeRun 9000 Aqua XU9100vsNarwal Freo X Ultra Extend