- brandnew.uk.com
- Compare
- Tiger 4242 vs PowerDetect
ETA Tiger 4242 vs Shark PowerDetect
What Tiger 4242 does better (3) and where PowerDetect wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.6Cleaning power2.4
8.5Navigation6.1
5.0Base station9.1
9.2Battery5.7
Why is Tiger 4242 better than PowerDetect?
- Runtime160 min vs 110 min+45%
- Dustbin (robot)600 ml vs 230 ml2.6×
- Charging time300 min vs 360 min+20%
Why is PowerDetect better than Tiger 4242?
- Base stationCharging dock vs Auto-empty dock
Specifications
Side by side
| Suction & cleaning | ||
| Dustbin (robot) | 600 ml | 230 ml |
| Main brush | — | Single main brush |
| Side brushes | — | 1 |
| Dirt detection | — | Yes |
| HEPA filter | Yes | — |
| Navigation & obstacles | ||
| Navigation | Laser (LiDAR) | Laser (LiDAR) |
| Navigation sensors | LiDAR laser (LDS) | LiDAR laser (LDS), Wall sensor, Cliff sensors |
| Obstacle avoidance | — | Basic sensors (infrared / bumper) |
| No-go zones / virtual walls | — | Yes |
| Room mapping & room selection | Yes | Yes |
| Base station | ||
| Base station | Charging dock | Auto-empty dock |
| Auto-empty dust station | — | Yes |
| Battery & runtime | ||
| Runtime | 160 min | 110 min |
| Charging time | 300 min | 360 min |
| Size & weight | ||
| Width / diameter | — | 340 mm |
| Length | — | 340 mm |
| Height | — | 145 mm |
| Shape | Round | Round |
| Colours | White | Black |
| App & smart home | ||
| App control | — | Yes |
| Voice assistants | Amazon Alexa, Google Assistant | Amazon Alexa, Google Assistant |
