- brandnew.uk.com
- Compare
- Tiger 4242 vs Roomba Max 705 Vac
ETA Tiger 4242 vs iRobot Roomba Max 705 Vac
What Tiger 4242 does better (1) and where Roomba Max 705 Vac wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.6Cleaning power3.4
8.5Navigation7.6
5.0Base station9.1
9.2Battery9.1
Why is Tiger 4242 better than Roomba Max 705 Vac?
- Dustbin (robot)600 ml vs 275 ml2.2×
Why is Roomba Max 705 Vac better than Tiger 4242?
- Base stationCharging dock vs Auto-empty dock
- Charging time300 min vs 240 min+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Suction & cleaning | ||
| Dustbin (robot) | 600 ml | 275 ml |
| Main brush | — | Dual main brushes |
| Anti-tangle brush | — | Yes |
| Side brushes | — | 1 |
| Dirt detection | — | Yes |
| HEPA filter | Yes | — |
| Noise level | — | 74 dB |
| Navigation & obstacles | ||
| Navigation | Laser (LiDAR) | Laser (LiDAR) |
| Navigation sensors | LiDAR laser (LDS) | LiDAR laser (LDS), Cliff sensors |
| Obstacle avoidance | — | Basic sensors (infrared / bumper) |
| Threshold climbing | — | 20 mm |
| Room mapping & room selection | Yes | Yes |
| Base station | ||
| Base station | Charging dock | Auto-empty dock |
| Auto-empty dust station | — | Yes |
| Battery & runtime | ||
| Battery capacity | — | 5,000 mAh |
| Runtime | 160 min | — |
| Charging time | 300 min | 240 min |
| Recharge & resume | — | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Width / diameter | — | 350 mm |
| Length | — | 350 mm |
| Height | — | 104 mm |
| Weight | — | 3.4 kg |
| Shape | Round | Round |
| Colours | White | Black |
| App & smart home | ||
| App control | — | Yes |
| Voice assistants | Amazon Alexa, Google Assistant | Amazon Alexa, Google Assistant, Apple Siri |
