- brandnew.uk.com
- Compare
- Rover vs VCRO300BK
ETA Rover vs Nedis VCRO300BK
What Rover does better (4) and where VCRO300BK wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
RoverVCRO300BK
| Rover | VCRO300BK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 77 mm | 85 mm | −8 mm |
| Width / diameter | 305 mm | 275 mm | +30 mm |
| Length | 305 mm | 275 mm | +30 mm |
| Weight | 2.7 kg | 1.3 kg | +1.4 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Rover better than VCRO300BK?
- Runtime110 min vs 90 min+22%
- Height77 mm vs 85 mm+10%
- Dustbin (robot)200 ml vs 120 ml+67%
- Noise level60 dB vs 65 dB+8%
Why is VCRO300BK better than Rover?
- Charging time300 min vs 240 min+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Suction & cleaning | ||
| Dustbin (robot) | 200 ml | 120 ml |
| Side brushes | 2 | 1 |
| HEPA filter | Yes | — |
| Noise level | 60 dB | 65 dB |
| Navigation & obstacles | ||
| Navigation | Camera (vSLAM) | — |
| Navigation sensors | vSLAM camera, Cliff sensors | Wall sensor, Cliff sensors |
| Obstacle avoidance | Basic sensors (infrared / bumper) | Basic sensors (infrared / bumper) |
| Threshold climbing | 15 mm | — |
| Room mapping & room selection | Yes | — |
| Mopping | ||
| Mop type | Mop pad | Mop pad |
| Water tank (robot) | 230 ml | — |
| Base station | ||
| Base station | Charging dock | Charging dock |
| Battery & runtime | ||
| Battery capacity | 2,600 mAh | 2,600 mAh |
| Runtime | 110 min | 90 min |
| Charging time | 300 min | 240 min |
| Size & weight | ||
| Width / diameter | 305 mm | 275 mm |
| Length | 305 mm | 275 mm |
| Height | 77 mm | 85 mm |
| Weight | 2.7 kg | 1.3 kg |
| Shape | Round | Round |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| App & smart home | ||
| App control | Yes | — |
| Remote control | Yes | — |
