- brandnew.uk.com
- Compare
- Rover vs SRV 1000SL
ETA Rover vs Sencor SRV 1000SL
What Rover does better (3) and where SRV 1000SL wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.2Navigation2.3
3.4Mopping2.3
2.6Battery2.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
RoverSRV 1000SL
| Rover | SRV 1000SL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 77 mm | 75 mm | +2 mm |
| Width / diameter | 305 mm | 280 mm | +25 mm |
| Length | 305 mm | 280 mm | +25 mm |
| Weight | 2.7 kg | 2.5 kg | +0.2 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Rover better than SRV 1000SL?
- Runtime110 min vs 80 min+38%
- Battery capacity2,600 mAh vs 1,500 mAh+73%
- Threshold climbing15 mm vs 10 mm+50%
Why is SRV 1000SL better than Rover?
- Charging time300 min vs 180 min+67%
- Height77 mm vs 75 mm+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Suction & cleaning | ||
| Dustbin (robot) | 200 ml | — |
| Side brushes | 2 | 2 |
| HEPA filter | Yes | — |
| Noise level | 60 dB | 60 dB |
| Navigation & obstacles | ||
| Navigation | Camera (vSLAM) | — |
| Navigation sensors | vSLAM camera, Cliff sensors | Cliff sensors |
| Obstacle avoidance | Basic sensors (infrared / bumper) | Basic sensors (infrared / bumper) |
| Threshold climbing | 15 mm | 10 mm |
| Room mapping & room selection | Yes | — |
| Mopping | ||
| Mop type | Mop pad | Mop pad |
| Water tank (robot) | 230 ml | — |
| Base station | ||
| Base station | Charging dock | Charging dock |
| Battery & runtime | ||
| Battery capacity | 2,600 mAh | 1,500 mAh |
| Runtime | 110 min | 80 min |
| Charging time | 300 min | 180 min |
| Size & weight | ||
| Width / diameter | 305 mm | 280 mm |
| Length | 305 mm | 280 mm |
| Height | 77 mm | 75 mm |
| Weight | 2.7 kg | 2.5 kg |
| Shape | Round | Round |
| Colours | Black | Black, Silver |
| App & smart home | ||
| App control | Yes | — |
| Remote control | Yes | — |
