- brandnew.uk.com
- Compare
- Rover vs M320
ETA Rover vs Lefant M320
What Rover does better (2) and where M320 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
RoverM320
| Rover | M320 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 77 mm | 79 mm | −2 mm |
| Width / diameter | 305 mm | 280 mm | +25 mm |
| Length | 305 mm | 280 mm | +25 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Rover better than M320?
- Threshold climbing15 mm vs 12 mm+25%
- Height77 mm vs 79 mm+3%
Why is M320 better than Rover?
- Runtime110 min vs 240 min2.2×
- Battery capacity2,600 mAh vs 4,000 mAh+54%
- Dustbin (robot)200 ml vs 800 ml4×
Specifications
Side by side
| Suction & cleaning | ||
| Suction power | — | 6,000 Pa |
| Dustbin (robot) | 200 ml | 800 ml |
| Side brushes | 2 | 2 |
| Carpet detection | — | Yes |
| HEPA filter | Yes | Yes |
| Noise level | 60 dB | 60 dB |
| Navigation & obstacles | ||
| Navigation | Camera (vSLAM) | — |
| Navigation sensors | vSLAM camera, Cliff sensors | Cliff sensors, Ultrasonic sensor |
| Obstacle avoidance | Basic sensors (infrared / bumper) | Basic sensors (infrared / bumper) |
| Threshold climbing | 15 mm | 12 mm |
| No-go zones / virtual walls | — | Yes |
| Room mapping & room selection | Yes | — |
| Mopping | ||
| Mop type | Mop pad | — |
| Water tank (robot) | 230 ml | — |
| Base station | ||
| Base station | Charging dock | Charging dock |
| Battery & runtime | ||
| Battery capacity | 2,600 mAh | 4,000 mAh |
| Runtime | 110 min | 240 min |
| Charging time | 300 min | — |
| Cleaning area per charge | — | 240 m² |
| Size & weight | ||
| Width / diameter | 305 mm | 280 mm |
| Length | 305 mm | 280 mm |
| Height | 77 mm | 79 mm |
| Weight | 2.7 kg | — |
| Shape | Round | Round |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| App & smart home | ||
| App control | Yes | Yes |
| Voice assistants | — | Amazon Alexa, Google Assistant |
| Remote control | Yes | — |
