- brandnew.uk.com
- Compare
- Galaxo 4239 vs Q10 X5
ETA Galaxo 4239 vs Roborock Q10 X5
What Galaxo 4239 does better (0) and where Q10 X5 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.1Navigation5.8
4.9Battery5.6
Why is Galaxo 4239 better than Q10 X5?
Galaxo 4239 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Q10 X5 better than Galaxo 4239?
- Noise level76 dB vs 60 dB+27%
Specifications
Side by side
| Suction & cleaning | ||
| Suction power | — | 10,000 Pa |
| Dustbin (robot) | — | 500 ml |
| Main brush | — | Single main brush |
| Anti-tangle brush | — | Yes |
| Side brushes | — | 1 |
| Carpet detection | — | Yes |
| HEPA filter | Yes | — |
| Noise level | 76 dB | 60 dB |
| Navigation & obstacles | ||
| Navigation | Laser (LiDAR) | Laser (LiDAR) |
| Navigation sensors | LiDAR laser (LDS) | LiDAR laser (LDS), Cliff sensors |
| Obstacle avoidance | — | Basic sensors (infrared / bumper) |
| Threshold climbing | — | 20 mm |
| No-go zones / virtual walls | — | Yes |
| Room mapping & room selection | Yes | Yes |
| Mopping | ||
| Mop type | — | Mop pad |
| Mop lifting on carpets | — | Yes |
| Mop lift height | — | 8 mm |
| Water tank (robot) | — | 200 ml |
| Base station | ||
| Base station | Charging dock | Charging dock |
| Battery & runtime | ||
| Battery capacity | — | 5,200 mAh |
| Runtime | 150 min | 150 min |
| Charging time | 300 min | — |
| Cleaning area per charge | — | 180 m² |
| Size & weight | ||
| Width / diameter | — | 353 mm |
| Length | — | 353 mm |
| Height | — | 99 mm |
| Weight | — | 4.7 kg |
| Shape | Round | Round |
| Colours | Black | White |
| App & smart home | ||
| App control | — | Yes |
| Voice assistants | — | Amazon Alexa, Google Assistant |
| Remote control | Yes | — |
