- brandnew.uk.com
- Compare
- Galaxo 4239 vs Q20 Plus
ETA Galaxo 4239 vs Proscenic Q20 Plus
What Galaxo 4239 does better (1) and where Q20 Plus wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.1Navigation5.8
4.9Battery5.7
Why is Galaxo 4239 better than Q20 Plus?
- Charging time300 min vs 360 min+20%
Why is Q20 Plus better than Galaxo 4239?
- Base stationCharging dock vs Auto-empty dock
- Runtime150 min vs 200 min+33%
- Noise level76 dB vs 65 dB+17%
Specifications
Side by side
| Suction & cleaning | ||
| Suction power | — | 10,000 Pa |
| Dustbin (robot) | — | 300 ml |
| Main brush | — | Single main brush |
| Anti-tangle brush | — | Yes |
| Side brushes | — | 1 |
| Carpet detection | — | Yes |
| HEPA filter | Yes | Yes |
| Noise level | 76 dB | 65 dB |
| Navigation & obstacles | ||
| Navigation | Laser (LiDAR) | Laser (LiDAR) |
| Navigation sensors | LiDAR laser (LDS) | LiDAR laser (LDS), Cliff sensors |
| Obstacle avoidance | — | Basic sensors (infrared / bumper) |
| Threshold climbing | — | 20 mm |
| No-go zones / virtual walls | — | Yes |
| Room mapping & room selection | Yes | Yes |
| Mopping | ||
| Mop type | — | Mop pad |
| Water tank (robot) | — | 200 ml |
| Base station | ||
| Base station | Charging dock | Auto-empty dock |
| Auto-empty dust station | — | Yes |
| Dust bag (dock) | — | 4 l |
| Battery & runtime | ||
| Battery capacity | — | 3,200 mAh |
| Runtime | 150 min | 200 min |
| Charging time | 300 min | 360 min |
| Cleaning area per charge | — | 230 m² |
| Size & weight | ||
| Width / diameter | — | 320 mm |
| Length | — | 320 mm |
| Height | — | 97 mm |
| Shape | Round | Round |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| App & smart home | ||
| App control | — | Yes |
| Voice assistants | — | Amazon Alexa, Google Assistant, Apple Siri |
| Remote control | Yes | Yes |
