- brandnew.uk.com
- Compare
- Deebot T50 Pro Omni Gen 2 vs QR 798
Ecovacs Deebot T50 Pro Omni Gen 2 vs Roborock QR 798
What Deebot T50 Pro Omni Gen 2 does better (7) and where QR 798 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.7Cleaning power6.8
8.2Navigation4.3
5.9Mopping6.5
8.4Base station8.8
8.6Battery6.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
Deebot T50 Pro Omni Gen 2QR 798
| Deebot T50 Pro Omni Gen 2 | QR 798 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 81 mm | 96 mm | −15 mm |
| Width / diameter | 353 mm | 353 mm | = |
| Length | 353 mm | 353 mm | = |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Deebot T50 Pro Omni Gen 2 better than QR 798?
- Suction power21,000 Pa vs 10,000 Pa2.1×
- Obstacle avoidanceAI camera vs Basic sensors (infrared / bumper)
- Battery capacity6,400 mAh vs 5,200 mAh+23%
- Height81 mm vs 96 mm+19%
- Charging time200 min vs 360 min+80%
- Dust bag (dock)4 l vs 2.7 l+48%
- Clean water tank (dock)4 l vs 3.5 l+14%
Why is QR 798 better than Deebot T50 Pro Omni Gen 2?
- Mop lift height9 mm vs 10 mm+11%
- Water tank (robot)55 ml vs 80 ml+45%
- Dustbin (robot)260 ml vs 330 ml+27%
Specifications
Side by side
| Suction & cleaning | ||
| Suction power | 21,000 Pa | 10,000 Pa |
| Dustbin (robot) | 260 ml | 330 ml |
| Main brush | Single main brush | Single main brush |
| Anti-tangle brush | Yes | Yes |
| Side brushes | 1 | 1 |
| Extending side brush | Yes | — |
| Carpet detection | Yes | Yes |
| Dirt detection | Yes | — |
| Noise level | 63 dB | 64 dB |
| Navigation & obstacles | ||
| Navigation | Laser (LiDAR) | Laser (LiDAR) |
| Navigation sensors | LiDAR laser (LDS), Wall sensor, Cliff sensors | LiDAR laser (LDS), Cliff sensors |
| Obstacle avoidance | AI camera | Basic sensors (infrared / bumper) |
| No-go zones / virtual walls | Yes | Yes |
| Room mapping & room selection | Yes | Yes |
| Mopping | ||
| Mop type | Rotating mop pads | Rotating mop pads |
| Mop lifting on carpets | Yes | Yes |
| Mop lift height | 9 mm | 10 mm |
| Extending mop (edges) | Yes | — |
| Water tank (robot) | 55 ml | 80 ml |
| Base station | ||
| Base station | All-in-one dock (empty + wash) | All-in-one dock (empty + wash) |
| Auto-empty dust station | Yes | Yes |
| Dust bag (dock) | 4 l | 2.7 l |
| Mop washing in the dock | Yes | Yes |
| Hot-water mop washing | Yes | — |
| Hot-air mop drying | Yes | — |
| Automatic water refill | Yes | Yes |
| Clean water tank (dock) | 4 l | 3.5 l |
| Dirty water tank (dock) | 3 l | — |
| Battery & runtime | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,400 mAh | 5,200 mAh |
| Runtime | 180 min | 180 min |
| Charging time | 200 min | 360 min |
| Size & weight | ||
| Width / diameter | 353 mm | 353 mm |
| Length | 353 mm | 353 mm |
| Height | 81 mm | 96 mm |
| Shape | Round | Round |
| Colours | Black | White |
| App & smart home | ||
| App control | Yes | Yes |
| Voice assistants | Amazon Alexa, Google Assistant, Built-in voice assistant | — |
| Live camera view / video call | Yes | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Dreame Aqua10 Ultra RollervsEcovacs Deebot T50 Pro Omni Gen 2
8.88.5
vs
Mova V50 UltravsEcovacs Deebot T50 Pro Omni Gen 2
7.98.5
vs
Mova Z60 Ultra RollervsEcovacs Deebot T50 Pro Omni Gen 2
8.88.5
vs
Dreame L10s Ultra Gen 3vsEcovacs Deebot T50 Pro Omni Gen 2
8.18.5
vs
Ecovacs Deebot T50 Pro Omni Gen 3vsEcovacs Deebot T50 Pro Omni Gen 2
8.58.5
vs
Roborock Saros Z70vsEcovacs Deebot T50 Pro Omni Gen 2
9.48.5