- brandnew.uk.com
- Compare
- Deebot T30S Pro vs HomeRun 9000 Aqua XU9100
Ecovacs Deebot T30S Pro vs Philips HomeRun 9000 Aqua XU9100
What Deebot T30S Pro does better (6) and where HomeRun 9000 Aqua XU9100 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.3Cleaning power4.7
8.5Navigation5.8
5.9Mopping3.7
6.8Base station7.4
9.4Battery9.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
Deebot T30S ProHomeRun 9000 Aqua XU9100
| Deebot T30S Pro | HomeRun 9000 Aqua XU9100 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 104 mm | 98 mm | +6 mm |
| Width / diameter | 353 mm | 365 mm | −12 mm |
| Length | 353 mm | 365 mm | −12 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Deebot T30S Pro better than HomeRun 9000 Aqua XU9100?
- Obstacle avoidanceAI camera vs Basic sensors (infrared / bumper)
- Mop typeRotating mop pads vs Mop pad
- Suction power11,000 Pa vs 8,000 Pa+38%
- Dustbin (robot)275 ml vs 210 ml+31%
- Clean water tank (dock)4 l vs 3.5 l+14%
- Charging time300 min vs 330 min+10%
Why is HomeRun 9000 Aqua XU9100 better than Deebot T30S Pro?
- Runtime265 min vs 280 min+6%
- Height104 mm vs 98 mm+6%
- Water tank (robot)55 ml vs 90 ml+64%
Specifications
Side by side
| Suction & cleaning | ||
| Suction power | 11,000 Pa | 8,000 Pa |
| Dustbin (robot) | 275 ml | 210 ml |
| Main brush | Single main brush | Single main brush |
| Anti-tangle brush | Yes | — |
| Side brushes | 1 | 1 |
| Carpet detection | Yes | Yes |
| HEPA filter | — | Yes |
| Noise level | 65 dB | 66 dB |
| Navigation & obstacles | ||
| Navigation | Laser (LiDAR) | Laser (LiDAR) |
| Navigation sensors | LiDAR laser (LDS), Wall sensor, Cliff sensors, Ultrasonic sensor | LiDAR laser (LDS), dToF laser, Wall sensor, Cliff sensors |
| Obstacle avoidance | AI camera | Basic sensors (infrared / bumper) |
| Threshold climbing | — | 20 mm |
| No-go zones / virtual walls | — | Yes |
| Room mapping & room selection | Yes | Yes |
| Mopping | ||
| Mop type | Rotating mop pads | Mop pad |
| Mop lifting on carpets | Yes | Yes |
| Mop lift height | 9 mm | — |
| Extending mop (edges) | Yes | — |
| Water tank (robot) | 55 ml | 90 ml |
| Base station | ||
| Base station | All-in-one dock (empty + wash) | All-in-one dock (empty + wash) |
| Auto-empty dust station | Yes | Yes |
| Dust bag (dock) | 3 l | 3 l |
| Mop washing in the dock | Yes | Yes |
| Hot-water mop washing | Yes | — |
| Hot-air mop drying | Yes | Yes |
| Automatic water refill | Yes | Yes |
| Clean water tank (dock) | 4 l | 3.5 l |
| Dirty water tank (dock) | 3.5 l | 2.7 l |
| Battery & runtime | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,400 mAh | 6,500 mAh |
| Runtime | 265 min | 280 min |
| Charging time | 300 min | 330 min |
| Cleaning area per charge | — | 250 m² |
| Size & weight | ||
| Width / diameter | 353 mm | 365 mm |
| Length | 353 mm | 365 mm |
| Height | 104 mm | 98 mm |
| Weight | — | 5 kg |
| Shape | Round | Round |
| Colours | Black | Grey, Black |
| App & smart home | ||
| App control | Yes | Yes |
| Voice assistants | Amazon Alexa, Google Assistant, Built-in voice assistant | Amazon Alexa, Google Assistant |
Related comparisons
vs
Ecovacs Deebot T30S ProvsNarwal Freo X Ultra Extend
vs
Ecovacs Deebot T30S ProvsMedion S35
vs
Ecovacs Deebot T30S ProvsSilvercrest SSR 3000 A1
vs
Ecovacs Deebot T30S ProvsSamsung Bespoke Jet Bot Combo AI+
vs
Philips HomeRun 3000 Aqua XU3100vsPhilips HomeRun 9000 Aqua XU9100
5.36.9
vs
Philips HomeRun 9000 Aqua XU9100vsNarwal Freo X Ultra Extend