- brandnew.uk.com
- Compare
- Conga 8290 Immortal Ultra Power Home X-Treme vs HomeRun 7000 Aqua XU7100
Cecotec Conga 8290 Immortal Ultra Power Home X-Treme vs Philips HomeRun 7000 Aqua XU7100
What Conga 8290 Immortal Ultra Power Home X-Treme does better (5) and where HomeRun 7000 Aqua XU7100 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Cecotec · 2023Conga 8290 Immortal Ultra Power Home X-Treme
6.8Score
Higher score 5 advantages≈ US$380
vs
5.3Cleaning power3.8
2.8Navigation8.0
2.4Mopping3.6
6.2Base station6.2
9.3Battery3.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
Conga 8290 Immortal Ultra Power Home X-TremeHomeRun 7000 Aqua XU7100
| Conga 8290 Immortal Ultra Power Home X-Treme | HomeRun 7000 Aqua XU7100 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 102 mm | 97 mm | +5 mm |
| Width / diameter | 350 mm | 350 mm | = |
| Length | 350 mm | 350 mm | = |
| Weight | 3.3 kg | 4 kg | −0.7 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Conga 8290 Immortal Ultra Power Home X-Treme better than HomeRun 7000 Aqua XU7100?
- Runtime280 min vs 85 min3.3×
- Suction power7,000 Pa vs 5,000 Pa+40%
- Cleaning area per charge280 m² vs 130 m²2.2×
- Charging time180 min vs 300 min+67%
- Dustbin (robot)340 ml vs 260 ml+31%
Why is HomeRun 7000 Aqua XU7100 better than Conga 8290 Immortal Ultra Power Home X-Treme?
- Obstacle avoidanceBasic sensors (infrared / bumper) vs AI camera
- Threshold climbing16 mm vs 20 mm+25%
- Height102 mm vs 97 mm+5%
Specifications
Side by side
| Suction & cleaning | ||
| Suction power | 7,000 Pa | 5,000 Pa |
| Dustbin (robot) | 340 ml | 260 ml |
| Main brush | Single main brush | Single main brush |
| Side brushes | 1 | 1 |
| Noise level | 65 dB | 65 dB |
| Navigation & obstacles | ||
| Navigation | Laser (LiDAR) | Laser (LiDAR) |
| Navigation sensors | LiDAR laser (LDS), Cliff sensors | LiDAR laser (LDS) |
| Obstacle avoidance | Basic sensors (infrared / bumper) | AI camera |
| Threshold climbing | 16 mm | 20 mm |
| No-go zones / virtual walls | Yes | Yes |
| Room mapping & room selection | Yes | — |
| Mopping | ||
| Mop type | Mop pad | Mop pad |
| Water tank (robot) | — | 240 ml |
| Base station | ||
| Base station | Auto-empty dock | Auto-empty dock |
| Auto-empty dust station | Yes | Yes |
| Dust bag (dock) | 3 l | 3 l |
| Battery & runtime | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,200 mAh | 5,200 mAh |
| Runtime | 280 min | 85 min |
| Charging time | 180 min | 300 min |
| Cleaning area per charge | 280 m² | 130 m² |
| Size & weight | ||
| Width / diameter | 350 mm | 350 mm |
| Length | 350 mm | 350 mm |
| Height | 102 mm | 97 mm |
| Weight | 3.3 kg | 4 kg |
| Shape | Round | Round |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| App & smart home | ||
| App control | Yes | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Roborock Q8 MaxvsCecotec Conga 8290 Immortal Ultra Power Home X-Treme
6.46.8
vs
Dreame L10 PrimevsCecotec Conga 8290 Immortal Ultra Power Home X-Treme
7.36.8
vs
Cecotec Conga 8290 Immortal Ultra Power Home X-TremevsRoborock Q8 Max+
6.87.0
vs
Cecotec Conga 8290 Immortal Ultra Power Home X-TremevsiRobot Roomba j7 j7156
vs
Philips HomeRun 7000 Aqua XU7000vsPhilips HomeRun 7000 Aqua XU7100
5.05.8
vs
Philips HomeRun 7000 Aqua XU7100vsPhilips HomeRun 9000 Aqua XU9100
5.87.2