- brandnew.uk.com
- Compare
- Conga 3390 vs Braava jet m6
Cecotec Conga 3390 vs iRobot Braava jet m6
What Conga 3390 does better (2) and where Braava jet m6 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.8Navigation2.6
2.3Mopping3.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Conga 3390Braava jet m6
| Conga 3390 | Braava jet m6 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 95 mm | 90 mm | +5 mm |
| Width / diameter | 340 mm | 270 mm | +70 mm |
| Length | 340 mm | 252 mm | +88 mm |
| Weight | 4.6 kg | 2.2 kg | +2.4 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Conga 3390 better than Braava jet m6?
- NavigationLaser (LiDAR) vs Camera (vSLAM)
- Obstacle avoidanceAI camera vs Basic sensors (infrared / bumper)
Why is Braava jet m6 better than Conga 3390?
- Height95 mm vs 90 mm+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Suction & cleaning | ||
| Dustbin (robot) | — | 100 ml |
| Main brush | Single main brush | — |
| Side brushes | 1 | — |
| Navigation & obstacles | ||
| Navigation | Laser (LiDAR) | Camera (vSLAM) |
| Navigation sensors | LiDAR laser (LDS), Cliff sensors | vSLAM camera |
| Obstacle avoidance | AI camera | Basic sensors (infrared / bumper) |
| No-go zones / virtual walls | — | Yes |
| Room mapping & room selection | — | Yes |
| Mopping | ||
| Mop type | Mop pad | Mop pad |
| Water tank (robot) | — | 500 ml |
| Base station | ||
| Base station | Charging dock | Charging dock |
| Battery & runtime | ||
| Runtime | — | 90 min |
| Charging time | — | 180 min |
| Cleaning area per charge | — | 97 m² |
| Recharge & resume | — | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Width / diameter | 340 mm | 270 mm |
| Length | 340 mm | 252 mm |
| Height | 95 mm | 90 mm |
| Weight | 4.6 kg | 2.2 kg |
| Shape | Round | — |
| Colours | Black | White, Grey |
| App & smart home | ||
| App control | Yes | Yes |
| Voice assistants | Amazon Alexa, Google Assistant | Amazon Alexa, Google Assistant |
