- brandnew.uk.com
- Compare
- SpinWave vs Conga 3390
Bissell SpinWave vs Cecotec Conga 3390
What SpinWave does better (2) and where Conga 3390 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.5Mopping2.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
SpinWaveConga 3390
| SpinWave | Conga 3390 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 85 mm | 95 mm | −10 mm |
| Width / diameter | 327 mm | 340 mm | −13 mm |
| Length | 327 mm | 340 mm | −13 mm |
| Weight | 3.4 kg | 4.6 kg | −1.2 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is SpinWave better than Conga 3390?
- Mop typeRotating mop pads vs Mop pad
- Height85 mm vs 95 mm+12%
Why is Conga 3390 better than SpinWave?
- Obstacle avoidanceBasic sensors (infrared / bumper) vs AI camera
Specifications
Side by side
| Suction & cleaning | ||
| Suction power | 1,500 Pa | — |
| Dustbin (robot) | 400 ml | — |
| Main brush | Single main brush | Single main brush |
| Side brushes | 2 | 1 |
| Carpet detection | Yes | — |
| Noise level | 50 dB | — |
| Navigation & obstacles | ||
| Navigation | — | Laser (LiDAR) |
| Navigation sensors | Cliff sensors | LiDAR laser (LDS), Cliff sensors |
| Obstacle avoidance | Basic sensors (infrared / bumper) | AI camera |
| Mopping | ||
| Mop type | Rotating mop pads | Mop pad |
| Water tank (robot) | 400 ml | — |
| Base station | ||
| Base station | Charging dock | Charging dock |
| Battery & runtime | ||
| Runtime | 130 min | — |
| Charging time | 240 min | — |
| Cleaning area per charge | 55 m² | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Width / diameter | 327 mm | 340 mm |
| Length | 327 mm | 340 mm |
| Height | 85 mm | 95 mm |
| Weight | 3.4 kg | 4.6 kg |
| Shape | Round | Round |
| Colours | White | Black |
| App & smart home | ||
| App control | Yes | Yes |
| Voice assistants | — | Amazon Alexa, Google Assistant |
