- brandnew.uk.com
- Compare
- Conga 1090 vs Rover
Cecotec Conga 1090 vs ETA Rover
What Conga 1090 does better (1) and where Rover wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.8Mopping3.4
4.3Battery2.6
Why is Conga 1090 better than Rover?
- Runtime160 min vs 110 min+45%
Why is Rover better than Conga 1090?
- Water tank (robot)150 ml vs 230 ml+53%
- Dustbin (robot)150 ml vs 200 ml+33%
- Noise level64 dB vs 60 dB+7%
Specifications
Side by side
| Suction & cleaning | ||
| Suction power | 1,400 Pa | — |
| Dustbin (robot) | 150 ml | 200 ml |
| Main brush | Single main brush | — |
| Side brushes | 2 | 2 |
| HEPA filter | — | Yes |
| Noise level | 64 dB | 60 dB |
| Navigation & obstacles | ||
| Navigation | — | Camera (vSLAM) |
| Navigation sensors | Cliff sensors | vSLAM camera, Cliff sensors |
| Obstacle avoidance | Basic sensors (infrared / bumper) | Basic sensors (infrared / bumper) |
| Threshold climbing | — | 15 mm |
| Room mapping & room selection | — | Yes |
| Mopping | ||
| Mop type | Mop pad | Mop pad |
| Water tank (robot) | 150 ml | 230 ml |
| Base station | ||
| Base station | Charging dock | Charging dock |
| Battery & runtime | ||
| Battery capacity | 2,600 mAh | 2,600 mAh |
| Runtime | 160 min | 110 min |
| Charging time | — | 300 min |
| Size & weight | ||
| Width / diameter | — | 305 mm |
| Length | — | 305 mm |
| Height | — | 77 mm |
| Weight | — | 2.7 kg |
| Shape | — | Round |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| App & smart home | ||
| App control | Yes | Yes |
| Remote control | Yes | Yes |
