Same price ≈ US$230
- Suction power 15,000 Pa vs 6,000 Pa
- Runtime 130 min vs 120 min
- Charging time 230 min vs 330 min
- Base station Charging dock vs Auto-empty dock
- Water tank (robot) 280 ml vs 300 ml
Alternatives to Philips HomeRun 2000 Gen 2 XU2100
10 robot vacuum and mop combos at a similar price that compete with the HomeRun 2000 Gen 2 XU2100 — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
approx. price≈ US$230
5.1
Alternatives to the HomeRun 2000 Gen 2 XU2100
4% pricier ≈ US$240
- Suction power 8,000 Pa vs 6,000 Pa
- Cleaning area per charge 200 m² vs 120 m²
- Dust bag (dock) 3.5 l vs 3 l
4% cheaper ≈ US$220
- Suction power 10,000 Pa vs 6,000 Pa
- Runtime 200 min vs 120 min
- Battery capacity 3,200 mAh vs 2,600 mAh
- Water tank (robot) 200 ml vs 300 ml
- Dustbin (robot) 300 ml vs 380 ml
4% cheaper ≈ US$220
- Runtime 180 min vs 120 min
- Noise level 55 dB vs 68 dB
- Charging time 300 min vs 330 min
- Suction power 5,000 Pa vs 6,000 Pa
- Water tank (robot) 200 ml vs 300 ml
9% cheaper ≈ US$210
- Runtime 180 min vs 120 min
- Threshold climbing 22 mm vs 17 mm
- Height 83 mm vs 97 mm
- Suction power 5,300 Pa vs 6,000 Pa
- Dustbin (robot) 300 ml vs 380 ml
Same price ≈ US$230
- Runtime 130 min vs 120 min
4% cheaper ≈ US$220
- Suction power 10,000 Pa vs 6,000 Pa
- Runtime 180 min vs 120 min
- Battery capacity 5,200 mAh vs 2,600 mAh
- Water tank (robot) 210 ml vs 300 ml
- Charging time 360 min vs 330 min
9% cheaper ≈ US$210
- Mop type Vibrating / sonic mop vs Mop pad
- Suction power 10,000 Pa vs 6,000 Pa
- Battery capacity 5,200 mAh vs 2,600 mAh
- Height 99 mm vs 97 mm
- Water tank (robot) 200 ml vs 300 ml
17% cheaper ≈ US$190
- Runtime 150 min vs 120 min
- Battery capacity 3,200 mAh vs 2,600 mAh
- Cleaning area per charge 225 m² vs 120 m²
- Dustbin (robot) 300 ml vs 380 ml
4% cheaper ≈ US$220
- Suction power 15,000 Pa vs 6,000 Pa
- Mop type Rotating mop pads vs Mop pad
- Runtime 180 min vs 120 min
- Base station Charging dock vs Auto-empty dock
- Height 99 mm vs 97 mm