Same price ≈ US$570
- Mop type Roller mop vs Rotating mop pads
- Water tank (robot) 240 ml vs 55 ml
- Height 96 mm vs 99 mm
- Suction power 8,000 Pa vs 11,000 Pa
- Dust bag (dock) 2.5 l vs 3 l
Alternatives to Bosch BCRDW3BX Spotless Max Cam
10 robot vacuum and mop combos at a similar price that compete with the BCRDW3BX Spotless Max Cam — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
approx. price≈ US$570
7.9
Alternatives to the BCRDW3BX Spotless Max Cam
9% pricier ≈ US$620
- Suction power 13,000 Pa vs 11,000 Pa
- Water tank (robot) 100 ml vs 55 ml
- Dust bag (dock) 5 l vs 3 l
Same price ≈ US$560
- Obstacle avoidance AI camera + 3D structured light vs AI camera
- Mop type Roller mop vs Rotating mop pads
- Suction power 19,500 Pa vs 11,000 Pa
- Dust bag (dock) 1.6 l vs 3 l
- Dustbin (robot) 220 ml vs 275 ml
7% cheaper ≈ US$530
- Dustbin (robot) 800 ml vs 275 ml
- Suction power 12,000 Pa vs 11,000 Pa
- Height 106 mm vs 99 mm
- Dust bag (dock) 2.5 l vs 3 l
14% pricier ≈ US$650
- Mop type Roller mop vs Rotating mop pads
- Suction power 18,000 Pa vs 11,000 Pa
- Water tank (robot) 110 ml vs 55 ml
- Dustbin (robot) 220 ml vs 275 ml
12% cheaper ≈ US$500
- Suction power 19,000 Pa vs 11,000 Pa
- Height 97 mm vs 99 mm
- Dustbin (robot) 395 ml vs 275 ml
5% cheaper ≈ US$540
- Mop type Roller mop vs Rotating mop pads
- Water tank (robot) 110 ml vs 55 ml
- Height 95 mm vs 99 mm
- Navigation Camera (vSLAM) vs Laser (LiDAR)
- Obstacle avoidance Basic sensors (infrared / bumper) vs AI camera
9% cheaper ≈ US$520
- Mop type Roller mop vs Rotating mop pads
- Suction power 18,000 Pa vs 11,000 Pa
- Water tank (robot) 110 ml vs 55 ml
- Dustbin (robot) 220 ml vs 275 ml
16% cheaper ≈ US$480
- Suction power 18,500 Pa vs 11,000 Pa
- Water tank (robot) 72 ml vs 55 ml
- Dustbin (robot) 325 ml vs 275 ml
- Dust bag (dock) 2.7 l vs 3 l
11% cheaper ≈ US$510
- Obstacle avoidance AI camera + 3D structured light vs AI camera
- Mop type Roller mop vs Rotating mop pads
- Suction power 19,500 Pa vs 11,000 Pa
- Dustbin (robot) 220 ml vs 275 ml