13% pricier ≈ US$170
- Dust bag (dock) 4 l vs 2.4 l
- Charging time 240 min vs 360 min
- Dustbin (robot) 400 ml vs 280 ml
- Runtime 150 min vs 175 min
- Threshold climbing 18 mm vs 20 mm
Alternatives to AEG Electrolux AR71UW2DG
10 robot vacuum and mop combos at a similar price that compete with the Electrolux AR71UW2DG — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
approx. price≈ US$150
5.2
Alternatives to the Electrolux AR71UW2DG
7% cheaper ≈ US$140
- Battery capacity 4,900 mAh vs 3,200 mAh
- Runtime 180 min vs 175 min
- Cleaning area per charge 300 m² vs 140 m²
- Base station Charging dock vs Auto-empty dock
20% pricier ≈ US$180
- Runtime 200 min vs 175 min
- Suction power 4,200 Pa vs 4,000 Pa
- Cleaning area per charge 230 m² vs 140 m²
- Threshold climbing 15 mm vs 20 mm
- Dust bag (dock) 2 l vs 2.4 l
20% pricier ≈ US$180
- Suction power 5,300 Pa vs 4,000 Pa
- Threshold climbing 22 mm vs 20 mm
- Charging time 240 min vs 360 min
- Runtime 150 min vs 175 min
- Battery capacity 2,600 mAh vs 3,200 mAh
27% pricier ≈ US$190
- Suction power 5,300 Pa vs 4,000 Pa
- Runtime 180 min vs 175 min
- Threshold climbing 22 mm vs 20 mm
- Base station Charging dock vs Auto-empty dock
- Battery capacity 2,600 mAh vs 3,200 mAh
7% pricier ≈ US$160
- Suction power 10,000 Pa vs 4,000 Pa
- Cleaning area per charge 210 m² vs 140 m²
- Dustbin (robot) 400 ml vs 280 ml
- Base station Charging dock vs Auto-empty dock
- Runtime 150 min vs 175 min
13% pricier ≈ US$170
- Suction power 8,000 Pa vs 4,000 Pa
- Dustbin (robot) 595 ml vs 280 ml
- Cleaning area per charge 290 m² vs 140 m²
- Base station Charging dock vs Auto-empty dock
- Runtime 150 min vs 175 min
13% pricier ≈ US$170
- Obstacle avoidance 3D structured light / line laser vs Basic sensors (infrared / bumper)
- Suction power 7,000 Pa vs 4,000 Pa
- Runtime 260 min vs 175 min
- Base station Charging dock vs Auto-empty dock
7% cheaper ≈ US$140
- Suction power 8,000 Pa vs 4,000 Pa
- Battery capacity 5,200 mAh vs 3,200 mAh
- Runtime 180 min vs 175 min
- Dust bag (dock) 2 l vs 2.4 l