- brandnew.uk.com
- Compare
- Explorer 40 Animal vs V3
Rowenta Explorer 40 Animal vs Viomi V3
What Explorer 40 Animal does better (2) and where V3 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.1Cleaning power2.7
2.3Navigation5.8
2.3Mopping2.3
4.4Battery5.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
Explorer 40 AnimalV3
| Explorer 40 Animal | V3 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 80 mm | 95 mm | −15 mm |
| Width / diameter | 325 mm | 350 mm | −25 mm |
| Length | 325 mm | 350 mm | −25 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Explorer 40 Animal better than V3?
- Height80 mm vs 95 mm+19%
- Noise level66 dB vs 75 dB+14%
Why is V3 better than Explorer 40 Animal?
- Threshold climbing10 mm vs 20 mm2×
- Suction power2,000 Pa vs 2,600 Pa+30%
Specifications
Side by side
| Suction & cleaning | ||
| Suction power | 2,000 Pa | 2,600 Pa |
| Dustbin (robot) | — | 500 ml |
| Main brush | Single main brush | Single main brush |
| Side brushes | 2 | 1 |
| HEPA filter | — | Yes |
| Noise level | 66 dB | 75 dB |
| Navigation & obstacles | ||
| Navigation | — | Laser (LiDAR) |
| Navigation sensors | Cliff sensors | LiDAR laser (LDS) |
| Obstacle avoidance | Basic sensors (infrared / bumper) | Basic sensors (infrared / bumper) |
| Threshold climbing | 10 mm | 20 mm |
| No-go zones / virtual walls | Yes | Yes |
| Room mapping & room selection | — | Yes |
| Mopping | ||
| Mop type | Mop pad | Mop pad |
| Base station | ||
| Base station | Charging dock | Charging dock |
| Battery & runtime | ||
| Battery capacity | — | 4,900 mAh |
| Runtime | 150 min | 150 min |
| Charging time | 360 min | — |
| Cleaning area per charge | — | 250 m² |
| Size & weight | ||
| Width / diameter | 325 mm | 350 mm |
| Length | 325 mm | 350 mm |
| Height | 80 mm | 95 mm |
| Weight | — | 3.6 kg |
| Shape | Round | Round |
| Colours | White | Black |
| App & smart home | ||
| App control | Yes | Yes |
| Voice assistants | — | Amazon Alexa, Google Assistant |
