- brandnew.uk.com
- Compare
- Qrevo S ProX vs Tapo RV50 Pro Omni
Roborock Qrevo S ProX vs TP-Link Tapo RV50 Pro Omni
What Qrevo S ProX does better (5) and where Tapo RV50 Pro Omni wins (5) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.7Cleaning power7.3
7.4Navigation6.8
6.5Mopping5.6
6.0Base station8.6
7.5Battery9.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
Qrevo S ProXTapo RV50 Pro Omni
| Qrevo S ProX | Tapo RV50 Pro Omni | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 96 mm | 100 mm | −4 mm |
| Width / diameter | 353 mm | 350 mm | +3 mm |
| Length | 353 mm | 350 mm | +3 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Qrevo S ProX better than Tapo RV50 Pro Omni?
- Obstacle avoidance3D structured light / line laser vs Basic sensors (infrared / bumper)
- Mop typeRotating mop pads vs Mop pad
- Suction power18,500 Pa vs 15,000 Pa+23%
- Height96 mm vs 100 mm+4%
- Dustbin (robot)330 ml vs 300 ml+10%
Why is Tapo RV50 Pro Omni better than Qrevo S ProX?
- Runtime180 min vs 250 min+39%
- Threshold climbing20 mm vs 22 mm+10%
- Clean water tank (dock)4 l vs 5 l+25%
- Water tank (robot)80 ml vs 95 ml+19%
- Dust bag (dock)2.7 l vs 3 l+11%
Specifications
Side by side
| Suction & cleaning | ||
| Suction power | 18,500 Pa | 15,000 Pa |
| Dustbin (robot) | 330 ml | 300 ml |
| Main brush | Single main brush | Single main brush |
| Anti-tangle brush | Yes | Yes |
| Side brushes | 1 | 1 |
| Carpet detection | Yes | Yes |
| HEPA filter | — | Yes |
| Noise level | 60 dB | — |
| Navigation & obstacles | ||
| Navigation | Laser (LiDAR) | Laser (LiDAR) |
| Navigation sensors | LiDAR laser (LDS), Wall sensor, Cliff sensors | LiDAR laser (LDS), Cliff sensors |
| Obstacle avoidance | 3D structured light / line laser | Basic sensors (infrared / bumper) |
| Threshold climbing | 20 mm | 22 mm |
| No-go zones / virtual walls | Yes | Yes |
| Room mapping & room selection | Yes | Yes |
| Mopping | ||
| Mop type | Rotating mop pads | Mop pad |
| Mop lifting on carpets | Yes | Yes |
| Mop lift height | 10 mm | — |
| Automatic mop removal | — | Yes |
| Extending mop (edges) | — | Yes |
| Water tank (robot) | 80 ml | 95 ml |
| Base station | ||
| Base station | All-in-one dock (empty + wash) | All-in-one dock (empty + wash) |
| Auto-empty dust station | Yes | Yes |
| Dust bag (dock) | 2.7 l | 3 l |
| Mop washing in the dock | Yes | Yes |
| Hot-water mop washing | Yes | Yes |
| Hot-air mop drying | Yes | Yes |
| Automatic water refill | Yes | Yes |
| Clean water tank (dock) | 4 l | 5 l |
| Dirty water tank (dock) | 3.5 l | 4 l |
| Battery & runtime | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,200 mAh | 5,200 mAh |
| Runtime | 180 min | 250 min |
| Charging time | 240 min | — |
| Cleaning area per charge | 300 m² | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Width / diameter | 353 mm | 350 mm |
| Length | 353 mm | 350 mm |
| Height | 96 mm | 100 mm |
| Weight | 4 kg | — |
| Shape | Round | Round |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| App & smart home | ||
| App control | Yes | Yes |
| Voice assistants | Amazon Alexa, Google Assistant, Apple Siri | Amazon Alexa, Google Assistant |
| Matter | Yes | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Roborock Qrevo S ProvsRoborock Qrevo S ProX
8.18.1
vs
Roborock Qrevo S ProXvsiRobot Roomba Plus 575 Combo
8.18.0
vs
Roborock Qrevo S ProXvsNarwal Freo X10 Pro
8.18.0
vs
Roborock Qrevo S ProXvsUltenic MX50
vs
Roborock Qrevo S ProXvsDaewoo Cyclone Freedom
vs
TP-Link Tapo RV50 Pro OmnivsMedion X55 SW+ Pro
7.87.9