- brandnew.uk.com
- Compare
- Q7 TF+ vs Robot Vacuum S40 Pro
Roborock Q7 TF+ vs Xiaomi Robot Vacuum S40 Pro
What Q7 TF+ does better (3) and where Robot Vacuum S40 Pro wins (6) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.5Cleaning power7.6
4.3Navigation5.0
4.4Mopping7.1
5.6Base station3.5
5.7Battery6.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Q7 TF+Robot Vacuum S40 Pro
| Q7 TF+ | Robot Vacuum S40 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 99 mm | 99 mm | = |
| Width / diameter | 325 mm | 355 mm | −30 mm |
| Length | 325 mm | 355 mm | −30 mm |
| Weight | 4.7 kg | 4.2 kg | +0.5 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Q7 TF+ better than Robot Vacuum S40 Pro?
- Base stationAuto-empty dock vs Charging dock
- Charging time180 min vs 360 min2×
- Cleaning area per charge300 m² vs 180 m²+67%
Why is Robot Vacuum S40 Pro better than Q7 TF+?
- Mop typeMop pad vs Rotating mop pads
- Suction power10,000 Pa vs 15,000 Pa+50%
- Battery capacity3,200 mAh vs 5,200 mAh+62%
- Runtime150 min vs 180 min+20%
- Dustbin (robot)200 ml vs 430 ml2.2×
- Water tank (robot)280 ml vs 310 ml+11%
Specifications
Side by side
| Suction & cleaning | ||
| Suction power | 10,000 Pa | 15,000 Pa |
| Dustbin (robot) | 200 ml | 430 ml |
| Main brush | Single main brush | Single main brush |
| Anti-tangle brush | Yes | Yes |
| Side brushes | 1 | 1 |
| Extending side brush | — | Yes |
| Carpet detection | — | Yes |
| HEPA filter | Yes | Yes |
| Noise level | 65 dB | 65 dB |
| Navigation & obstacles | ||
| Navigation | Laser (LiDAR) | Laser (LiDAR) |
| Navigation sensors | LiDAR laser (LDS), Cliff sensors | LiDAR laser (LDS), Wall sensor, Cliff sensors |
| Obstacle avoidance | Basic sensors (infrared / bumper) | Basic sensors (infrared / bumper) |
| Threshold climbing | — | 20 mm |
| No-go zones / virtual walls | Yes | — |
| Room mapping & room selection | Yes | Yes |
| Mopping | ||
| Mop type | Mop pad | Rotating mop pads |
| Mop lifting on carpets | — | Yes |
| Mop lift height | — | 10 mm |
| Extending mop (edges) | — | Yes |
| Water tank (robot) | 280 ml | 310 ml |
| Base station | ||
| Base station | Auto-empty dock | Charging dock |
| Auto-empty dust station | Yes | — |
| Dust bag (dock) | 2.7 l | — |
| Battery & runtime | ||
| Battery capacity | 3,200 mAh | 5,200 mAh |
| Runtime | 150 min | 180 min |
| Charging time | 180 min | 360 min |
| Cleaning area per charge | 300 m² | 180 m² |
| Size & weight | ||
| Width / diameter | 325 mm | 355 mm |
| Length | 325 mm | 355 mm |
| Height | 99 mm | 99 mm |
| Weight | 4.7 kg | 4.2 kg |
| Shape | Round | Round |
| Colours | Black | White |
| App & smart home | ||
| App control | Yes | Yes |
| Voice assistants | Amazon Alexa | Amazon Alexa, Google Assistant |
Related comparisons
vs
Mova V50 UltravsRoborock Q7 TF+
8.16.5
vs
Dreame Aqua10 Ultra RollervsRoborock Q7 TF+
9.06.5
vs
Mova Z60 Ultra RollervsRoborock Q7 TF+
9.06.5
vs
Dreame L10s Ultra Gen 3vsRoborock Q7 TF+
8.46.5
vs
Roborock Q7 TF+vsEcovacs Deebot T50 Pro Omni Gen 2
6.58.7
vs
Roborock Saros 20XvsRoborock Q7 TF+
9.56.5