- brandnew.uk.com
- Compare
- Q10 PF vs T8
Roborock Q10 PF vs Vexilar T8
What Q10 PF does better (1) and where T8 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
Why is Q10 PF better than T8?
- Dustbin (robot)500 ml vs 300 ml+67%
Why is T8 better than Q10 PF?
T8 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Suction & cleaning | ||
| Suction power | 10,000 Pa | — |
| Dustbin (robot) | 500 ml | 300 ml |
| Main brush | Single main brush | — |
| Anti-tangle brush | Yes | — |
| Side brushes | 1 | — |
| Carpet detection | Yes | — |
| HEPA filter | Yes | — |
| Noise level | 65 dB | — |
| Navigation & obstacles | ||
| Navigation | Laser (LiDAR) | — |
| Navigation sensors | LiDAR laser (LDS), Cliff sensors | Cliff sensors |
| Obstacle avoidance | Basic sensors (infrared / bumper) | Basic sensors (infrared / bumper) |
| No-go zones / virtual walls | Yes | — |
| Room mapping & room selection | Yes | — |
| Mopping | ||
| Mop type | Mop pad | — |
| Mop lifting on carpets | Yes | — |
| Mop lift height | 8 mm | — |
| Water tank (robot) | 200 ml | — |
| Base station | ||
| Base station | Charging dock | — |
| Auto-empty dust station | Yes | — |
| Dust bag (dock) | 2.7 l | — |
| Battery & runtime | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,200 mAh | — |
| Runtime | 150 min | 150 min |
| Charging time | 240 min | — |
| Cleaning area per charge | 280 m² | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Width / diameter | 353 mm | — |
| Length | 353 mm | — |
| Height | 99 mm | — |
| Weight | 4.7 kg | — |
| Shape | Round | — |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| App & smart home | ||
| App control | Yes | — |
| Voice assistants | Amazon Alexa, Google Assistant | — |
