- brandnew.uk.com
- Compare
- HomeRun 9000 Aqua XU9100 vs Qrevo Pro
Philips HomeRun 9000 Aqua XU9100 vs Roborock Qrevo Pro
What HomeRun 9000 Aqua XU9100 does better (6) and where Qrevo Pro wins (7) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.6Cleaning power5.9
5.8Navigation8.3
3.7Mopping6.6
8.4Base station7.6
9.4Battery6.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
HomeRun 9000 Aqua XU9100Qrevo Pro
| HomeRun 9000 Aqua XU9100 | Qrevo Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 98 mm | 96 mm | +2 mm |
| Width / diameter | 365 mm | 353 mm | +12 mm |
| Length | 365 mm | 353 mm | +12 mm |
| Weight | 5 kg | 3.8 kg | +1.2 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is HomeRun 9000 Aqua XU9100 better than Qrevo Pro?
- Runtime280 min vs 180 min+56%
- Suction power8,000 Pa vs 7,000 Pa+14%
- Cleaning area per charge250 m² vs 100 m²2.5×
- Battery capacity6,500 mAh vs 5,200 mAh+25%
- Water tank (robot)90 ml vs 80 ml+12%
- Dust bag (dock)3 l vs 2.7 l+11%
Why is Qrevo Pro better than HomeRun 9000 Aqua XU9100?
- Obstacle avoidanceBasic sensors (infrared / bumper) vs AI camera
- Mop typeMop pad vs Rotating mop pads
- Height98 mm vs 96 mm+2%
- Dustbin (robot)210 ml vs 330 ml+57%
- Charging time330 min vs 240 min+38%
- Clean water tank (dock)3.5 l vs 4 l+14%
- Noise level66 dB vs 63 dB+5%
Specifications
Side by side
| Suction & cleaning | ||
| Suction power | 8,000 Pa | 7,000 Pa |
| Dustbin (robot) | 210 ml | 330 ml |
| Main brush | Single main brush | Single main brush |
| Side brushes | 1 | 1 |
| Carpet detection | Yes | Yes |
| Dirt detection | — | Yes |
| HEPA filter | Yes | Yes |
| Noise level | 66 dB | 63 dB |
| Navigation & obstacles | ||
| Navigation | Laser (LiDAR) | Laser (LiDAR) |
| Navigation sensors | LiDAR laser (LDS), dToF laser, Wall sensor, Cliff sensors | LiDAR laser (LDS), Wall sensor, Cliff sensors |
| Obstacle avoidance | Basic sensors (infrared / bumper) | AI camera |
| Threshold climbing | 20 mm | — |
| No-go zones / virtual walls | Yes | Yes |
| Room mapping & room selection | Yes | Yes |
| Mopping | ||
| Mop type | Mop pad | Rotating mop pads |
| Mop lifting on carpets | Yes | Yes |
| Mop lift height | — | 10 mm |
| Water tank (robot) | 90 ml | 80 ml |
| Base station | ||
| Base station | All-in-one dock (empty + wash) | All-in-one dock (empty + wash) |
| Auto-empty dust station | Yes | Yes |
| Dust bag (dock) | 3 l | 2.7 l |
| Mop washing in the dock | Yes | Yes |
| Hot-water mop washing | — | Yes |
| Hot-air mop drying | Yes | Yes |
| Automatic water refill | Yes | Yes |
| Clean water tank (dock) | 3.5 l | 4 l |
| Dirty water tank (dock) | 2.7 l | 3.5 l |
| Battery & runtime | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,500 mAh | 5,200 mAh |
| Runtime | 280 min | 180 min |
| Charging time | 330 min | 240 min |
| Cleaning area per charge | 250 m² | 100 m² |
| Size & weight | ||
| Width / diameter | 365 mm | 353 mm |
| Length | 365 mm | 353 mm |
| Height | 98 mm | 96 mm |
| Weight | 5 kg | 3.8 kg |
| Shape | Round | Round |
| Colours | Grey, Black | White |
| App & smart home | ||
| App control | Yes | Yes |
| Voice assistants | Amazon Alexa, Google Assistant | Amazon Alexa, Google Assistant, Apple Siri |
| Live camera view / video call | — | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Philips HomeRun 9000 Aqua XU9100vsXiaomi Robot Vacuum X20 Max
7.27.3
vs
Philips HomeRun 3000 Aqua XU3100vsPhilips HomeRun 9000 Aqua XU9100
5.77.2
vs
Philips HomeRun 9000 Aqua XU9100vsNarwal Freo X Ultra Extend
vs
Philips HomeRun 9000 Aqua XU9100vsUltenic T10 Lite
7.27.2
vs
Philips HomeRun 7000 Aqua XU7100vsPhilips HomeRun 9000 Aqua XU9100
5.87.2
vs
Philips HomeRun 9000 Aqua XU9100vsSilvercrest SSR 3000 A1