- brandnew.uk.com
- Compare
- SL68W vs Q7 TF
Lubluelu SL68W vs Roborock Q7 TF
What SL68W does better (2) and where Q7 TF wins (4) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
SL68WQ7 TF
| SL68W | Q7 TF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 92 mm | 99 mm | −7 mm |
| Width / diameter | 325 mm | 325 mm | = |
| Length | 325 mm | 325 mm | = |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is SL68W better than Q7 TF?
- Height92 mm vs 99 mm+8%
- Noise level54 dB vs 65 dB+20%
Why is Q7 TF better than SL68W?
- Suction power4,500 Pa vs 10,000 Pa2.2×
- Battery capacity2,600 mAh vs 3,200 mAh+23%
- Dustbin (robot)200 ml vs 400 ml2×
- Water tank (robot)250 ml vs 270 ml+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Suction & cleaning | ||
| Suction power | 4,500 Pa | 10,000 Pa |
| Dustbin (robot) | 200 ml | 400 ml |
| Main brush | Single main brush | Single main brush |
| Anti-tangle brush | — | Yes |
| Side brushes | 1 | 1 |
| HEPA filter | Yes | — |
| Noise level | 54 dB | 65 dB |
| Navigation & obstacles | ||
| Navigation | Laser (LiDAR) | Laser (LiDAR) |
| Navigation sensors | LiDAR laser (LDS), Wall sensor, Cliff sensors | LiDAR laser (LDS), Cliff sensors |
| Obstacle avoidance | — | Basic sensors (infrared / bumper) |
| No-go zones / virtual walls | Yes | Yes |
| Room mapping & room selection | Yes | Yes |
| Mopping | ||
| Mop type | Mop pad | Mop pad |
| Water tank (robot) | 250 ml | 270 ml |
| Base station | ||
| Base station | Charging dock | Charging dock |
| Battery & runtime | ||
| Battery capacity | 2,600 mAh | 3,200 mAh |
| Runtime | 150 min | 150 min |
| Cleaning area per charge | — | 300 m² |
| Size & weight | ||
| Width / diameter | 325 mm | 325 mm |
| Length | 325 mm | 325 mm |
| Height | 92 mm | 99 mm |
| Weight | — | 4.7 kg |
| Shape | Round | Round |
| Colours | White | White |
| App & smart home | ||
| App control | Yes | Yes |
| Voice assistants | Amazon Alexa, Google Assistant | — |
