- brandnew.uk.com
- Compare
- M310 vs HomeRun 2000 XU2000
Lefant M310 vs Philips HomeRun 2000 XU2000
What M310 does better (2) and where HomeRun 2000 XU2000 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.5Cleaning power4.7
4.3Battery2.7
Why is M310 better than HomeRun 2000 XU2000?
- Base stationMop-washing dock vs Charging dock
- Runtime140 min vs 120 min+17%
Why is HomeRun 2000 XU2000 better than M310?
- Suction power4,500 Pa vs 6,000 Pa+33%
Specifications
Side by side
| Suction & cleaning | ||
| Suction power | 4,500 Pa | 6,000 Pa |
| Dustbin (robot) | — | 380 ml |
| Main brush | — | Single main brush |
| Side brushes | — | 1 |
| Carpet detection | — | Yes |
| HEPA filter | Yes | — |
| Noise level | — | 68 dB |
| Navigation & obstacles | ||
| Navigation | — | Laser (LiDAR) |
| Navigation sensors | — | LiDAR laser (LDS), Cliff sensors |
| Obstacle avoidance | — | Basic sensors (infrared / bumper) |
| Threshold climbing | — | 17 mm |
| No-go zones / virtual walls | — | Yes |
| Room mapping & room selection | — | Yes |
| Mopping | ||
| Mop type | — | Mop pad |
| Water tank (robot) | — | 300 ml |
| Base station | ||
| Base station | Mop-washing dock | Charging dock |
| Auto-empty dust station | — | Yes |
| Mop washing in the dock | Yes | — |
| Battery & runtime | ||
| Battery capacity | — | 2,600 mAh |
| Runtime | 140 min | 120 min |
| Charging time | — | 330 min |
| Cleaning area per charge | — | 120 m² |
| Size & weight | ||
| Width / diameter | — | 345 mm |
| Length | — | 345 mm |
| Height | — | 97 mm |
| Weight | — | 3.1 kg |
| Shape | Round | Round |
| Colours | — | White |
| App & smart home | ||
| App control | Yes | Yes |
| Voice assistants | Google Assistant | Amazon Alexa, Google Assistant |
| Remote control | Yes | — |
