- brandnew.uk.com
- Compare
- RCF 3 vs MD 20053
Kärcher RCF 3 vs Medion MD 20053
What RCF 3 does better (4) and where MD 20053 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
RCF 3MD 20053
| RCF 3 | MD 20053 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 120 mm | 118 mm | +2 mm |
| Width / diameter | 340 mm | 285 mm | +55 mm |
| Length | 340 mm | 285 mm | +55 mm |
| Weight | 4.5 kg | 3.6 kg | +0.9 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is RCF 3 better than MD 20053?
- NavigationLaser (LiDAR) vs Gyroscope
- Mop typeRoller mop vs Mop pad
- Runtime120 min vs 80 min+50%
- Charging time180 min vs 300 min+67%
Why is MD 20053 better than RCF 3?
MD 20053 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Suction & cleaning | ||
| Main brush | — | Single main brush |
| Carpet detection | Yes | — |
| Navigation & obstacles | ||
| Navigation | Laser (LiDAR) | Gyroscope |
| Navigation sensors | LiDAR laser (LDS), Cliff sensors, Ultrasonic sensor | Gyroscope |
| Obstacle avoidance | Basic sensors (infrared / bumper) | — |
| Threshold climbing | 15 mm | — |
| No-go zones / virtual walls | Yes | — |
| Room mapping & room selection | Yes | — |
| Mopping | ||
| Mop type | Roller mop | Mop pad |
| Water tank (robot) | — | 850 ml |
| Base station | ||
| Base station | Charging dock | Charging dock |
| Battery & runtime | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,200 mAh | — |
| Runtime | 120 min | 80 min |
| Charging time | 180 min | 300 min |
| Cleaning area per charge | 80 m² | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Width / diameter | 340 mm | 285 mm |
| Length | 340 mm | 285 mm |
| Height | 120 mm | 118 mm |
| Weight | 4.5 kg | 3.6 kg |
| Shape | Round | Round |
| Colours | White, Black | White, Black |
| App & smart home | ||
| App control | Yes | — |
| Remote control | — | Yes |
