- brandnew.uk.com
- Compare
- Roomba s9+ vs MD 18379
iRobot Roomba s9+ vs Medion MD 18379
What Roomba s9+ does better (4) and where MD 18379 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.1Base station5.4
8.5Battery2.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
Roomba s9+MD 18379
| Roomba s9+ | MD 18379 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 89 mm | 118 mm | −29 mm |
| Width / diameter | 312 mm | 285 mm | +27 mm |
| Length | 312 mm | 285 mm | +27 mm |
| Weight | 4 kg | 3.6 kg | +0.4 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Roomba s9+ better than MD 18379?
- Runtime120 min vs 80 min+50%
- Base stationAuto-empty dock vs Charging dock
- Charging time60 min vs 300 min5×
- Height89 mm vs 118 mm+33%
Why is MD 18379 better than Roomba s9+?
MD 18379 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Suction & cleaning | ||
| Dustbin (robot) | 500 ml | — |
| Side brushes | 1 | — |
| Dirt detection | Yes | — |
| Noise level | 65 dB | — |
| Navigation & obstacles | ||
| Navigation sensors | Cliff sensors | — |
| Obstacle avoidance | Basic sensors (infrared / bumper) | — |
| Threshold climbing | 20 mm | — |
| No-go zones / virtual walls | — | Yes |
| Room mapping & room selection | Yes | — |
| Mopping | ||
| Mop type | — | Roller mop |
| Water tank (robot) | — | 800 ml |
| Base station | ||
| Base station | Auto-empty dock | Charging dock |
| Auto-empty dust station | Yes | — |
| Battery & runtime | ||
| Battery capacity | — | 2,200 mAh |
| Runtime | 120 min | 80 min |
| Charging time | 60 min | 300 min |
| Cleaning area per charge | — | 25 m² |
| Recharge & resume | Yes | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Width / diameter | 312 mm | 285 mm |
| Length | 312 mm | 285 mm |
| Height | 89 mm | 118 mm |
| Weight | 4 kg | 3.6 kg |
| Shape | — | Round |
| Colours | — | Black, Grey |
| App & smart home | ||
| App control | Yes | — |
| Voice assistants | Amazon Alexa, Google Assistant | — |
| Remote control | Yes | Yes |
