- brandnew.uk.com
- Compare
- Roomba Combo j9+ vs SSR 3000 A1
iRobot Roomba Combo j9+ vs Silvercrest SSR 3000 A1
What Roomba Combo j9+ does better (2) and where SSR 3000 A1 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.8Battery2.4
Why is Roomba Combo j9+ better than SSR 3000 A1?
- Charging time180 min vs 300 min+67%
- Dustbin (robot)313 ml vs 300 ml+4%
Why is SSR 3000 A1 better than Roomba Combo j9+?
SSR 3000 A1 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Suction & cleaning | ||
| Dustbin (robot) | 313 ml | 300 ml |
| Main brush | Dual main brushes | — |
| Side brushes | 1 | — |
| Carpet detection | Yes | — |
| Dirt detection | Yes | — |
| HEPA filter | — | Yes |
| Noise level | — | 68 dB |
| Navigation & obstacles | ||
| Navigation sensors | Cliff sensors | Cliff sensors |
| Obstacle avoidance | Basic sensors (infrared / bumper) | Basic sensors (infrared / bumper) |
| Room mapping & room selection | Yes | — |
| Mopping | ||
| Mop type | Mop pad | — |
| Mop lifting on carpets | Yes | — |
| Water tank (robot) | 210 ml | — |
| Base station | ||
| Base station | Auto-empty dock | — |
| Auto-empty dust station | Yes | — |
| Automatic water refill | Yes | — |
| Clean water tank (dock) | 3 l | — |
| Battery & runtime | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,500 mAh | — |
| Runtime | — | 100 min |
| Charging time | 180 min | 300 min |
| Recharge & resume | Yes | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Width / diameter | 348 mm | — |
| Length | 348 mm | — |
| Height | 87 mm | — |
| Weight | 4.1 kg | — |
| Shape | Round | Round |
| Colours | Black, Gold | White |
| App & smart home | ||
| App control | Yes | Yes |
| Voice assistants | Amazon Alexa, Google Assistant, Apple Siri | Google Assistant |
Related comparisons
vs
iRobot Roomba Combo j9+vsiRobot Roomba Combo j5+
5.64.4
vs
iRobot Roomba Combo j7+vsiRobot Roomba Combo j9+
4.75.6
vs
iRobot Roomba Combo j9+vsRoborock S6 Pure
vs
iRobot Roomba Combo j9+vsMedion S35
vs
iRobot Roomba Combo j9+vsCecotec Conga 999 Origin Genesis
vs
Dreame X50 UltravsSilvercrest SSR 3000 A1