- brandnew.uk.com
- Compare
- Roomba 697 vs Kobold VR300
iRobot Roomba 697 vs Vorwerk Kobold VR300
What Roomba 697 does better (3) and where Kobold VR300 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.8Cleaning power3.2
4.4Navigation5.6
5.0Base station5.0
3.5Battery4.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Roomba 697Kobold VR300
| Roomba 697 | Kobold VR300 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 94 mm | 90 mm | +4 mm |
| Width / diameter | 340 mm | 340 mm | = |
| Length | 340 mm | 340 mm | = |
| Weight | 3.6 kg | 5 kg | −1.4 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Roomba 697 better than Kobold VR300?
- Dustbin (robot)600 ml vs 300 ml2×
- Charging time120 min vs 180 min+50%
- Noise level61 dB vs 70 dB+15%
Why is Kobold VR300 better than Roomba 697?
- Height94 mm vs 90 mm+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Suction & cleaning | ||
| Dustbin (robot) | 600 ml | 300 ml |
| Main brush | Dual main brushes | — |
| Side brushes | 1 | — |
| Carpet detection | Yes | — |
| Dirt detection | Yes | — |
| Noise level | 61 dB | 70 dB |
| Navigation & obstacles | ||
| Navigation sensors | Wall sensor, Cliff sensors | Cliff sensors |
| Obstacle avoidance | Basic sensors (infrared / bumper) | Basic sensors (infrared / bumper) |
| No-go zones / virtual walls | — | Yes |
| Base station | ||
| Base station | Charging dock | Charging dock |
| Battery & runtime | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,800 mAh | — |
| Runtime | 90 min | 90 min |
| Charging time | 120 min | 180 min |
| Cleaning area per charge | — | 120 m² |
| Size & weight | ||
| Width / diameter | 340 mm | 340 mm |
| Length | 340 mm | 340 mm |
| Height | 94 mm | 90 mm |
| Weight | 3.6 kg | 5 kg |
| Shape | Round | — |
| Colours | Black, Grey | White |
| App & smart home | ||
| App control | Yes | Yes |
| Voice assistants | Amazon Alexa, Google Assistant | — |
| Remote control | Yes | Yes |
