- brandnew.uk.com
- Compare
- Roomba 697 vs Jet Bot
iRobot Roomba 697 vs Samsung Jet Bot
What Roomba 697 does better (3) and where Jet Bot wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.8Cleaning power2.2
4.4Navigation6.1
4.9Base station8.0
3.4Battery4.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
Roomba 697Jet Bot
| Roomba 697 | Jet Bot | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 94 mm | 99 mm | −5 mm |
| Width / diameter | 340 mm | 350 mm | −10 mm |
| Length | 340 mm | 350 mm | −10 mm |
| Weight | 3.6 kg | 3.4 kg | +0.2 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Roomba 697 better than Jet Bot?
- Charging time120 min vs 240 min2×
- Height94 mm vs 99 mm+5%
- Noise level61 dB vs 76 dB+25%
Why is Jet Bot better than Roomba 697?
- Base stationCharging dock vs Auto-empty dock
Specifications
Side by side
| Suction & cleaning | ||
| Dustbin (robot) | 600 ml | — |
| Main brush | Dual main brushes | Single main brush |
| Side brushes | 1 | 1 |
| Carpet detection | Yes | Yes |
| Dirt detection | Yes | — |
| Noise level | 61 dB | 76 dB |
| Navigation & obstacles | ||
| Navigation | — | Laser (LiDAR) |
| Navigation sensors | Wall sensor, Cliff sensors | LiDAR laser (LDS), Cliff sensors |
| Obstacle avoidance | Basic sensors (infrared / bumper) | Basic sensors (infrared / bumper) |
| No-go zones / virtual walls | — | Yes |
| Room mapping & room selection | — | Yes |
| Base station | ||
| Base station | Charging dock | Auto-empty dock |
| Auto-empty dust station | — | Yes |
| Dust bag (dock) | — | 2.5 l |
| Battery & runtime | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,800 mAh | — |
| Runtime | 90 min | 90 min |
| Charging time | 120 min | 240 min |
| Size & weight | ||
| Width / diameter | 340 mm | 350 mm |
| Length | 340 mm | 350 mm |
| Height | 94 mm | 99 mm |
| Weight | 3.6 kg | 3.4 kg |
| Shape | Round | Round |
| Colours | Black, Grey | White, Silver |
| App & smart home | ||
| App control | Yes | Yes |
| Voice assistants | Amazon Alexa, Google Assistant | Amazon Alexa, Google Assistant |
| Remote control | Yes | — |
