- brandnew.uk.com
- Compare
- Roomba 697 vs MD 18379
iRobot Roomba 697 vs Medion MD 18379
What Roomba 697 does better (3) and where MD 18379 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.0Base station5.4
3.5Battery2.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
Roomba 697MD 18379
| Roomba 697 | MD 18379 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 94 mm | 118 mm | −24 mm |
| Width / diameter | 340 mm | 285 mm | +55 mm |
| Length | 340 mm | 285 mm | +55 mm |
| Weight | 3.6 kg | 3.6 kg | = |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Roomba 697 better than MD 18379?
- Runtime90 min vs 80 min+12%
- Charging time120 min vs 300 min2.5×
- Height94 mm vs 118 mm+26%
Why is MD 18379 better than Roomba 697?
- Battery capacity1,800 mAh vs 2,200 mAh+22%
Specifications
Side by side
| Suction & cleaning | ||
| Dustbin (robot) | 600 ml | — |
| Main brush | Dual main brushes | — |
| Side brushes | 1 | — |
| Carpet detection | Yes | — |
| Dirt detection | Yes | — |
| Noise level | 61 dB | — |
| Navigation & obstacles | ||
| Navigation sensors | Wall sensor, Cliff sensors | — |
| Obstacle avoidance | Basic sensors (infrared / bumper) | — |
| No-go zones / virtual walls | — | Yes |
| Mopping | ||
| Mop type | — | Roller mop |
| Water tank (robot) | — | 800 ml |
| Base station | ||
| Base station | Charging dock | Charging dock |
| Battery & runtime | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,800 mAh | 2,200 mAh |
| Runtime | 90 min | 80 min |
| Charging time | 120 min | 300 min |
| Cleaning area per charge | — | 25 m² |
| Size & weight | ||
| Width / diameter | 340 mm | 285 mm |
| Length | 340 mm | 285 mm |
| Height | 94 mm | 118 mm |
| Weight | 3.6 kg | 3.6 kg |
| Shape | Round | Round |
| Colours | Black, Grey | Black, Grey |
| App & smart home | ||
| App control | Yes | — |
| Voice assistants | Amazon Alexa, Google Assistant | — |
| Remote control | Yes | Yes |
