- brandnew.uk.com
- Compare
- Roomba 697 vs Roomba s9+
iRobot Roomba 697 vs iRobot Roomba s9+
What Roomba 697 does better (2) and where Roomba s9+ wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.8Cleaning power7.2
4.4Navigation5.9
5.0Base station9.1
3.5Battery8.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Roomba 697Roomba s9+
| Roomba 697 | Roomba s9+ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 94 mm | 89 mm | +5 mm |
| Width / diameter | 340 mm | 312 mm | +28 mm |
| Length | 340 mm | 312 mm | +28 mm |
| Weight | 3.6 kg | 4 kg | −0.4 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Roomba 697 better than Roomba s9+?
- Dustbin (robot)600 ml vs 500 ml+20%
- Noise level61 dB vs 65 dB+7%
Why is Roomba s9+ better than Roomba 697?
- Base stationCharging dock vs Auto-empty dock
- Runtime90 min vs 120 min+33%
- Charging time120 min vs 60 min2×
- Height94 mm vs 89 mm+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Suction & cleaning | ||
| Dustbin (robot) | 600 ml | 500 ml |
| Main brush | Dual main brushes | — |
| Side brushes | 1 | 1 |
| Carpet detection | Yes | — |
| Dirt detection | Yes | Yes |
| Noise level | 61 dB | 65 dB |
| Navigation & obstacles | ||
| Navigation sensors | Wall sensor, Cliff sensors | Cliff sensors |
| Obstacle avoidance | Basic sensors (infrared / bumper) | Basic sensors (infrared / bumper) |
| Threshold climbing | — | 20 mm |
| Room mapping & room selection | — | Yes |
| Base station | ||
| Base station | Charging dock | Auto-empty dock |
| Auto-empty dust station | — | Yes |
| Battery & runtime | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,800 mAh | — |
| Runtime | 90 min | 120 min |
| Charging time | 120 min | 60 min |
| Recharge & resume | — | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Width / diameter | 340 mm | 312 mm |
| Length | 340 mm | 312 mm |
| Height | 94 mm | 89 mm |
| Weight | 3.6 kg | 4 kg |
| Shape | Round | — |
| Colours | Black, Grey | — |
| App & smart home | ||
| App control | Yes | Yes |
| Voice assistants | Amazon Alexa, Google Assistant | Amazon Alexa, Google Assistant |
| Remote control | Yes | Yes |
