- brandnew.uk.com
- Compare
- RV1 vs Q7 TF+
Imou RV1 vs Roborock Q7 TF+
What RV1 does better (1) and where Q7 TF+ wins (4) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
RV1Q7 TF+
| RV1 | Q7 TF+ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 98 mm | 99 mm | −1 mm |
| Width / diameter | 350 mm | 325 mm | +25 mm |
| Length | 350 mm | 325 mm | +25 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is RV1 better than Q7 TF+?
- Dustbin (robot)300 ml vs 200 ml+50%
Why is Q7 TF+ better than RV1?
- Suction power4,500 Pa vs 10,000 Pa2.2×
- Base stationCharging dock vs Auto-empty dock
- Runtime110 min vs 150 min+36%
- Water tank (robot)250 ml vs 280 ml+12%
Specifications
Side by side
| Suction & cleaning | ||
| Suction power | 4,500 Pa | 10,000 Pa |
| Dustbin (robot) | 300 ml | 200 ml |
| Main brush | Single main brush | Single main brush |
| Anti-tangle brush | — | Yes |
| Side brushes | 1 | 1 |
| Carpet detection | Yes | — |
| Noise level | 65 dB | 65 dB |
| Navigation & obstacles | ||
| Navigation | Laser (LiDAR) | Laser (LiDAR) |
| Navigation sensors | LiDAR laser (LDS), Cliff sensors | LiDAR laser (LDS), Cliff sensors |
| Obstacle avoidance | Basic sensors (infrared / bumper) | Basic sensors (infrared / bumper) |
| Threshold climbing | 20 mm | — |
| No-go zones / virtual walls | Yes | Yes |
| Room mapping & room selection | Yes | Yes |
| Mopping | ||
| Mop type | Mop pad | Mop pad |
| Water tank (robot) | 250 ml | 280 ml |
| Base station | ||
| Base station | Charging dock | Auto-empty dock |
| Auto-empty dust station | — | Yes |
| Dust bag (dock) | — | 2.7 l |
| Battery & runtime | ||
| Battery capacity | 3,200 mAh | 3,200 mAh |
| Runtime | 110 min | 150 min |
| Charging time | 240 min | — |
| Cleaning area per charge | — | 300 m² |
| Size & weight | ||
| Width / diameter | 350 mm | 325 mm |
| Length | 350 mm | 325 mm |
| Height | 98 mm | 99 mm |
| Weight | — | 4.7 kg |
| Shape | Round | Round |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| App & smart home | ||
| App control | Yes | Yes |
