- brandnew.uk.com
- Compare
- Hydro Pro vs HomeRun 3000 Aqua XU3100
Hoover Hydro Pro vs Philips HomeRun 3000 Aqua XU3100
What Hydro Pro does better (0) and where HomeRun 3000 Aqua XU3100 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.5Cleaning power3.7
7.1Navigation2.8
Why is Hydro Pro better than HomeRun 3000 Aqua XU3100?
Hydro Pro has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is HomeRun 3000 Aqua XU3100 better than Hydro Pro?
HomeRun 3000 Aqua XU3100 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Suction & cleaning | ||
| Suction power | 4,000 Pa | 4,000 Pa |
| Dustbin (robot) | — | 350 ml |
| Main brush | — | Single main brush |
| Side brushes | — | 1 |
| Carpet detection | — | Yes |
| Noise level | — | 66 dB |
| Navigation & obstacles | ||
| Navigation | Laser (LiDAR) | Laser (LiDAR) |
| Navigation sensors | LiDAR laser (LDS) | LiDAR laser (LDS), Cliff sensors |
| Obstacle avoidance | — | Basic sensors (infrared / bumper) |
| Threshold climbing | — | 17 mm |
| No-go zones / virtual walls | — | Yes |
| Room mapping & room selection | Yes | Yes |
| Mopping | ||
| Mop type | — | Mop pad |
| Water tank (robot) | — | 300 ml |
| Base station | ||
| Base station | Auto-empty dock | Auto-empty dock |
| Auto-empty dust station | Yes | Yes |
| Dust bag (dock) | — | 3 l |
| Battery & runtime | ||
| Battery capacity | — | 4,800 mAh |
| Runtime | — | 200 min |
| Charging time | — | 390 min |
| Cleaning area per charge | — | 150 m² |
| Size & weight | ||
| Width / diameter | — | 341 mm |
| Length | — | 341 mm |
| Height | — | 96 mm |
| Weight | 2.6 kg | 3.8 kg |
| Shape | Round | Round |
| Colours | Black, Blue | Black, Grey |
| App & smart home | ||
| App control | Yes | Yes |
