- brandnew.uk.com
- Compare
- HG2 Hydro Turbo Slim vs RCF 3
Hoover HG2 Hydro Turbo Slim vs Kärcher RCF 3
What HG2 Hydro Turbo Slim does better (1) and where RCF 3 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.8Navigation4.0
5.4Base station5.4
6.3Battery5.0
Why is HG2 Hydro Turbo Slim better than RCF 3?
- Runtime160 min vs 120 min+33%
Why is RCF 3 better than HG2 Hydro Turbo Slim?
- Charging time300 min vs 180 min+67%
Specifications
Side by side
| Suction & cleaning | ||
| Carpet detection | — | Yes |
| Noise level | 73 dB | — |
| Navigation & obstacles | ||
| Navigation | Laser (LiDAR) | Laser (LiDAR) |
| Navigation sensors | LiDAR laser (LDS) | LiDAR laser (LDS), Cliff sensors, Ultrasonic sensor |
| Obstacle avoidance | — | Basic sensors (infrared / bumper) |
| Threshold climbing | — | 15 mm |
| No-go zones / virtual walls | — | Yes |
| Room mapping & room selection | Yes | Yes |
| Mopping | ||
| Mop type | — | Roller mop |
| Base station | ||
| Base station | Charging dock | Charging dock |
| Battery & runtime | ||
| Battery capacity | — | 5,200 mAh |
| Runtime | 160 min | 120 min |
| Charging time | 300 min | 180 min |
| Cleaning area per charge | — | 80 m² |
| Size & weight | ||
| Width / diameter | 330 mm | 340 mm |
| Length | 330 mm | 340 mm |
| Height | — | 120 mm |
| Weight | 3.1 kg | 4.5 kg |
| Shape | Round | Round |
| Colours | Black | White, Black |
| App & smart home | ||
| App control | — | Yes |
