- brandnew.uk.com
- Compare
- RO201 R2 vs Exvac 880
Hoogo RO201 R2 vs Mamibot Exvac 880
What RO201 R2 does better (3) and where Exvac 880 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
RO201 R2Exvac 880
| RO201 R2 | Exvac 880 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 70 mm | 98 mm | −28 mm |
| Width / diameter | 300 mm | 330 mm | −30 mm |
| Length | 300 mm | 330 mm | −30 mm |
| Weight | 1.5 kg | 3.2 kg | −1.7 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is RO201 R2 better than Exvac 880?
- Height70 mm vs 98 mm+40%
- Cleaning area per charge130 m² vs 120 m²+8%
- Noise level65 dB vs 70 dB+8%
Why is Exvac 880 better than RO201 R2?
- Charging time270 min vs 120 min2.2×
Specifications
Side by side
| Suction & cleaning | ||
| Dustbin (robot) | — | 300 ml |
| Main brush | Single main brush | — |
| Side brushes | 2 | — |
| Noise level | 65 dB | 70 dB |
| Navigation & obstacles | ||
| Navigation | — | Laser (LiDAR) |
| Navigation sensors | Cliff sensors | LiDAR laser (LDS) |
| Obstacle avoidance | Basic sensors (infrared / bumper) | — |
| Room mapping & room selection | — | Yes |
| Base station | ||
| Base station | Charging dock | — |
| Battery & runtime | ||
| Battery capacity | 2,400 mAh | — |
| Runtime | 120 min | 120 min |
| Charging time | 270 min | 120 min |
| Cleaning area per charge | 130 m² | 120 m² |
| Size & weight | ||
| Width / diameter | 300 mm | 330 mm |
| Length | 300 mm | 330 mm |
| Height | 70 mm | 98 mm |
| Weight | 1.5 kg | 3.2 kg |
| Shape | Round | Round |
| Colours | Black, Blue | White |
| App & smart home | ||
| App control | — | Yes |
| Voice assistants | — | Amazon Alexa, Google Assistant |
