- brandnew.uk.com
- Compare
- RC3 vs RO201 R2
EZVIZ RC3 vs Hoogo RO201 R2
What RC3 does better (3) and where RO201 R2 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
RC3RO201 R2
| RC3 | RO201 R2 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 78 mm | 70 mm | +8 mm |
| Width / diameter | 345 mm | 300 mm | +45 mm |
| Length | 345 mm | 300 mm | +45 mm |
| Weight | 2.8 kg | 1.5 kg | +1.3 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is RC3 better than RO201 R2?
- Runtime190 min vs 120 min+58%
- Battery capacity2,600 mAh vs 2,400 mAh+8%
- Cleaning area per charge200 m² vs 130 m²+54%
Why is RO201 R2 better than RC3?
- Height78 mm vs 70 mm+11%
- Charging time300 min vs 270 min+11%
- Noise level68 dB vs 65 dB+5%
Specifications
Side by side
| Suction & cleaning | ||
| Suction power | 2,700 Pa | — |
| Dustbin (robot) | 800 ml | — |
| Main brush | Single main brush | Single main brush |
| Side brushes | 1 | 2 |
| Carpet detection | Yes | — |
| Noise level | 68 dB | 65 dB |
| Navigation & obstacles | ||
| Navigation | Gyroscope | — |
| Navigation sensors | Gyroscope, Wall sensor, Cliff sensors | Cliff sensors |
| Obstacle avoidance | Basic sensors (infrared / bumper) | Basic sensors (infrared / bumper) |
| Threshold climbing | 20 mm | — |
| Base station | ||
| Base station | Charging dock | Charging dock |
| Auto-empty dust station | Yes | — |
| Battery & runtime | ||
| Battery capacity | 2,600 mAh | 2,400 mAh |
| Runtime | 190 min | 120 min |
| Charging time | 300 min | 270 min |
| Cleaning area per charge | 200 m² | 130 m² |
| Size & weight | ||
| Width / diameter | 345 mm | 300 mm |
| Length | 345 mm | 300 mm |
| Height | 78 mm | 70 mm |
| Weight | 2.8 kg | 1.5 kg |
| Shape | Round | Round |
| Colours | White | Black, Blue |
| App & smart home | ||
| Remote control | Yes | — |
