- brandnew.uk.com
- Compare
- Galaxo 4239 vs Q7 TF+
ETA Galaxo 4239 vs Roborock Q7 TF+
What Galaxo 4239 does better (0) and where Q7 TF+ wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.2Navigation4.3
3.5Base station5.6
5.0Battery5.7
Why is Galaxo 4239 better than Q7 TF+?
Galaxo 4239 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Q7 TF+ better than Galaxo 4239?
- Base stationCharging dock vs Auto-empty dock
- Charging time300 min vs 180 min+67%
- Noise level76 dB vs 65 dB+17%
Specifications
Side by side
| Suction & cleaning | ||
| Suction power | — | 10,000 Pa |
| Dustbin (robot) | — | 200 ml |
| Main brush | — | Single main brush |
| Anti-tangle brush | — | Yes |
| Side brushes | — | 1 |
| HEPA filter | Yes | Yes |
| Noise level | 76 dB | 65 dB |
| Navigation & obstacles | ||
| Navigation | Laser (LiDAR) | Laser (LiDAR) |
| Navigation sensors | LiDAR laser (LDS) | LiDAR laser (LDS), Cliff sensors |
| Obstacle avoidance | — | Basic sensors (infrared / bumper) |
| No-go zones / virtual walls | — | Yes |
| Room mapping & room selection | Yes | Yes |
| Mopping | ||
| Mop type | — | Mop pad |
| Water tank (robot) | — | 280 ml |
| Base station | ||
| Base station | Charging dock | Auto-empty dock |
| Auto-empty dust station | — | Yes |
| Dust bag (dock) | — | 2.7 l |
| Battery & runtime | ||
| Battery capacity | — | 3,200 mAh |
| Runtime | 150 min | 150 min |
| Charging time | 300 min | 180 min |
| Cleaning area per charge | — | 300 m² |
| Size & weight | ||
| Width / diameter | — | 325 mm |
| Length | — | 325 mm |
| Height | — | 99 mm |
| Weight | — | 4.7 kg |
| Shape | Round | Round |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| App & smart home | ||
| App control | — | Yes |
| Voice assistants | — | Amazon Alexa |
| Remote control | Yes | — |
