- brandnew.uk.com
- Compare
- Galaxo 4239 vs Q10 PF
ETA Galaxo 4239 vs Roborock Q10 PF
What Galaxo 4239 does better (0) and where Q10 PF wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.2Navigation4.3
3.5Base station5.0
5.0Battery6.3
Why is Galaxo 4239 better than Q10 PF?
Galaxo 4239 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Q10 PF better than Galaxo 4239?
- Charging time300 min vs 240 min+25%
- Noise level76 dB vs 65 dB+17%
Specifications
Side by side
| Suction & cleaning | ||
| Suction power | — | 10,000 Pa |
| Dustbin (robot) | — | 500 ml |
| Main brush | — | Single main brush |
| Anti-tangle brush | — | Yes |
| Side brushes | — | 1 |
| Carpet detection | — | Yes |
| HEPA filter | Yes | Yes |
| Noise level | 76 dB | 65 dB |
| Navigation & obstacles | ||
| Navigation | Laser (LiDAR) | Laser (LiDAR) |
| Navigation sensors | LiDAR laser (LDS) | LiDAR laser (LDS), Cliff sensors |
| Obstacle avoidance | — | Basic sensors (infrared / bumper) |
| No-go zones / virtual walls | — | Yes |
| Room mapping & room selection | Yes | Yes |
| Mopping | ||
| Mop type | — | Mop pad |
| Mop lifting on carpets | — | Yes |
| Mop lift height | — | 8 mm |
| Water tank (robot) | — | 200 ml |
| Base station | ||
| Base station | Charging dock | Charging dock |
| Auto-empty dust station | — | Yes |
| Dust bag (dock) | — | 2.7 l |
| Battery & runtime | ||
| Battery capacity | — | 5,200 mAh |
| Runtime | 150 min | 150 min |
| Charging time | 300 min | 240 min |
| Cleaning area per charge | — | 280 m² |
| Size & weight | ||
| Width / diameter | — | 353 mm |
| Length | — | 353 mm |
| Height | — | 99 mm |
| Weight | — | 4.7 kg |
| Shape | Round | Round |
| Colours | Black | White |
| App & smart home | ||
| App control | — | Yes |
| Voice assistants | — | Amazon Alexa, Google Assistant |
| Remote control | Yes | — |
