- brandnew.uk.com
- Compare
- Deebot X2 Combo vs HomeRun 9000 Aqua XU9100
Ecovacs Deebot X2 Combo vs Philips HomeRun 9000 Aqua XU9100
What Deebot X2 Combo does better (7) and where HomeRun 9000 Aqua XU9100 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.7Cleaning power4.7
6.8Navigation5.8
8.8Mopping3.7
6.8Base station7.4
7.8Battery9.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
Deebot X2 ComboHomeRun 9000 Aqua XU9100
| Deebot X2 Combo | HomeRun 9000 Aqua XU9100 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 95 mm | 98 mm | −3 mm |
| Width / diameter | 320 mm | 365 mm | −45 mm |
| Length | 320 mm | 365 mm | −45 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Deebot X2 Combo better than HomeRun 9000 Aqua XU9100?
- Mop typeRotating mop pads vs Mop pad
- Suction power8,700 Pa vs 8,000 Pa+9%
- Dustbin (robot)420 ml vs 210 ml2×
- Water tank (robot)180 ml vs 90 ml2×
- Threshold climbing22 mm vs 20 mm+10%
- Height95 mm vs 98 mm+3%
- Clean water tank (dock)4 l vs 3.5 l+14%
Why is HomeRun 9000 Aqua XU9100 better than Deebot X2 Combo?
- Runtime186 min vs 280 min+51%
- Noise level78 dB vs 66 dB+18%
Specifications
Side by side
| Suction & cleaning | ||
| Suction power | 8,700 Pa | 8,000 Pa |
| Dustbin (robot) | 420 ml | 210 ml |
| Main brush | Single main brush | Single main brush |
| Side brushes | 1 | 1 |
| Carpet detection | Yes | Yes |
| HEPA filter | — | Yes |
| Noise level | 78 dB | 66 dB |
| Navigation & obstacles | ||
| Navigation | Laser (LiDAR) | Laser (LiDAR) |
| Navigation sensors | LiDAR laser (LDS) | LiDAR laser (LDS), dToF laser, Wall sensor, Cliff sensors |
| Obstacle avoidance | Basic sensors (infrared / bumper) | Basic sensors (infrared / bumper) |
| Threshold climbing | 22 mm | 20 mm |
| No-go zones / virtual walls | Yes | Yes |
| Room mapping & room selection | Yes | Yes |
| Mopping | ||
| Mop type | Rotating mop pads | Mop pad |
| Mop lifting on carpets | Yes | Yes |
| Mop lift height | 15 mm | — |
| Water tank (robot) | 180 ml | 90 ml |
| Base station | ||
| Base station | All-in-one dock (empty + wash) | All-in-one dock (empty + wash) |
| Auto-empty dust station | Yes | Yes |
| Dust bag (dock) | 3 l | 3 l |
| Mop washing in the dock | Yes | Yes |
| Hot-water mop washing | Yes | — |
| Hot-air mop drying | Yes | Yes |
| Automatic water refill | Yes | Yes |
| Clean water tank (dock) | 4 l | 3.5 l |
| Dirty water tank (dock) | — | 2.7 l |
| Battery & runtime | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,400 mAh | 6,500 mAh |
| Runtime | 186 min | 280 min |
| Charging time | 330 min | 330 min |
| Cleaning area per charge | — | 250 m² |
| Recharge & resume | Yes | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Width / diameter | 320 mm | 365 mm |
| Length | 320 mm | 365 mm |
| Height | 95 mm | 98 mm |
| Weight | — | 5 kg |
| Shape | Round | Round |
| Colours | Black | Grey, Black |
| App & smart home | ||
| App control | Yes | Yes |
| Voice assistants | Amazon Alexa, Google Assistant | Amazon Alexa, Google Assistant |
Related comparisons
vs
Ecovacs Deebot X2 CombovsNarwal Freo X Ultra Extend
vs
Ecovacs Deebot X2 CombovsMedion S35
vs
Ecovacs Deebot X2 CombovsSilvercrest SSR 3000 A1
vs
Ecovacs Deebot X2 CombovsSamsung Bespoke Jet Bot Combo AI+
vs
Philips HomeRun 3000 Aqua XU3100vsPhilips HomeRun 9000 Aqua XU9100
5.36.9
vs
Philips HomeRun 9000 Aqua XU9100vsNarwal Freo X Ultra Extend